Show Idle (>14 d.) Chans


← 2021-11-19 | 2021-11-21 →
01:05 jonsykkel ignore paket is 428byte Message field full of rngolade?
~ 55 minutes ~
02:01 asciilifeform jonsykkel: well to be pedantic, is simply a packet where command==0xff. but recommended to fill it up with rngolade, yes
02:03 jonsykkel i see
~ 14 hours 43 minutes ~
16:46 asciilifeform $ticker btc usd
16:46 busybot Current BTC price in USD: $57823.15
16:46 asciilifeform !w poll
16:46 watchglass Polling 17 nodes...
16:46 watchglass 176.9.59.199:8333 : Could not connect! (Operator: jurov)
16:46 watchglass 185.85.38.54:8333 : Could not connect!
16:46 watchglass 84.16.46.130:8333 : Could not connect!
16:46 watchglass 205.134.172.6:8333 : (172-6.core.ai.net) Alive: (0.081s) V=99999 (/therealbitcoin.org:0.9.99.99/) Jumpers=0x1 (TRB-Compat.) Return Addr=0.0.0.0:8333 Blocks=710586
16:46 watchglass 185.163.46.29:8333 : Could not connect!
16:46 watchglass 213.109.238.156:8333 : Could not connect!
16:46 watchglass 205.134.172.4:8333 : (172-4.core.ai.net) Alive: (0.082s) V=70001 (/therealbitcoin.org:0.7.0.1/) Jumpers=0x1 (TRB-Compat.) Blocks=710586
16:46 watchglass 205.134.172.26:8333 : Alive: (0.084s) V=99999 (/therealbitcoin.org:0.9.99.99/) Jumpers=0x1 (TRB-Compat.) Return Addr=0.0.0.0:8333 Blocks=710586
16:46 watchglass 71.191.220.241:8333 : (pool-71-191-220-241.washdc.fios.verizon.net) Alive: (0.154s) V=99999 (/therealbitcoin.org:0.9.99.99/) Jumpers=0x1 (TRB-Compat.) Blocks=710586 (Operator: asciilifeform)
16:46 watchglass 205.134.172.27:8333 : Alive: (0.145s) V=99999 (/therealbitcoin.org:0.9.99.99/) Jumpers=0x1 (TRB-Compat.) Blocks=710586 (Operator: asciilifeform)
16:46 watchglass 54.39.156.171:8333 : (ns562940.ip-54-39-156.net) Alive: (0.172s) V=99999 (/therealbitcoin.org:0.9.99.99/) Jumpers=0x1 (TRB-Compat.) Blocks=710586
16:46 watchglass 205.134.172.28:8333 : Alive: (0.083s) V=99999 (/therealbitcoin.org:0.9.99.99/) Jumpers=0x1 (TRB-Compat.) Return Addr=0.0.0.0:8333 Blocks=710586 (Operator: whaack)
16:46 watchglass 208.94.240.42:8333 : Alive: (0.164s) V=99999 (/therealbitcoin.org:0.9.99.99/) Jumpers=0x1 (TRB-Compat.) Blocks=710586
16:46 watchglass 143.202.160.10:8333 : Alive: (0.244s) V=70001 (/therealbitcoin.org:0.7.0.1/) Jumpers=0x1 (TRB-Compat.) Blocks=710586
16:46 watchglass 54.38.94.63:8333 : (ns3140226.ip-54-38-94.eu) Alive: (0.325s) V=88888 (/therealbitcoin.org:0.8.88.88/) Jumpers=0x1 (TRB-Compat.) Blocks=710586
16:46 watchglass 103.36.92.112:8333 : (terebe.ns01.net) Alive: (0.585s) V=99999 (/therealbitcoin.org:0.9.99.99/) Jumpers=0x1 (TRB-Compat.) Blocks=710586
16:48 watchglass 192.151.158.26:8333 : Busy? (No answer in 100 sec.)
16:52 asciilifeform bonechewer: http://www.loper-os.org/?p=3969#comment-20006
16:56 asciilifeform thimbronion et al ^
17:06 signpost yeah, I'd recommend that syncs of the entire history happen via a bulk mechanism, e.g. a lubytorrent
17:07 * signpost can imagine a situation where say 20 friendlies all collaborate (without needing to coordinate) to send me the chat history
17:08 signpost one beautiful aspect of onlinecodes is they allow the friendlies to just start spewing generated check-blocks without communicating about who will start where.
17:08 signpost this results in a pretty damned efficient transfer too.
17:16 signpost can easily imagine a protocol for this where the recipient still has strictly finite and known amounts of data to receive per interval, e.g. 1) plz send me up to C check blocks generated from message blocks between hash H1 and H2, 2) friendlies all reply with a proposed transfer of a fixed number of check blocks generated from blocks within H1->H2, 3) receiving station confirms
17:16 signpost proposed transfers and receives each stream into a fixed-length buffer it allocated, 4) receiving station decodes check blocks to message blocks on disk 5) receiving station either is satisfied or requests another batch of check blocks from friends.
17:16 * signpost has particulars to work out, but rough sketch.
~ 1 hours 35 minutes ~
18:52 signpost http://logs.nosuchlabs.com/log/asciilifeform/2021-11-14#1065635 << I'm probably going to bite the same bullet over here, feh.
18:52 dulapbot Logged on 2021-11-14 11:48:09 asciilifeform: fwiw earlier this yr asciilifeform grudgingly went to 5.11.3 (in torture room strictly, on account of this) , built a-ok w/ gcc 4.9.
~ 3 hours 30 minutes ~
22:22 asciilifeform http://logs.nosuchlabs.com/log/asciilifeform/2021-11-20#1066924 << at this pt signpost is prolly better read re lubyisms than asciilifeform , but all the variations on the theme i know of require agreement on the exact item being 'torrented' (if you will) for this kind of cooperation
22:22 dulapbot Logged on 2021-11-20 12:08:09 signpost: one beautiful aspect of onlinecodes is they allow the friendlies to just start spewing generated check-blocks without communicating about who will start where.
22:23 asciilifeform i.e. bitwise agreement, 'we're all sharing wikilicks.tar.gz and hash of it is H'. rather than 'we each have a log history with possibly 10% missing, each in different spot'
22:24 asciilifeform if signpost knows of a lubyistic algo for the latter, would be interesting to hear it tho
22:25 asciilifeform the other observation is that when dealing w/ broadcasts, yer dealing with 'extended' wot, with potentially varying degrees of 'friendliness', and not always known apriori.
22:26 asciilifeform lubyisms are unbeatable when you know the hash of the warezball you want to get, and perhaps even a subtree of chunk hashes
22:26 asciilifeform i.e. for trb blox would be a++
22:27 asciilifeform for 'swiss cheese' afaik not so much
22:28 asciilifeform bonechewer: http://www.loper-os.org/?p=3969#comment-20008
← 2021-11-19 | 2021-11-21 →