| 00:48 |
trinque |
whaack: there are a few reasons the lisp code in these published items is idiosyncratic. I'd be happy to explain why sometime. |
| 00:49 |
trinque |
the short version is that I wrote the classes like I were writing Java. |
| 00:50 |
trinque |
mostly idiosyncratic in naming, but nevertheless, not to be taken as exemplar lisp. |
| 00:50 |
trinque |
that'd be the problem too; I don't know where to find exemplar lisp. it seems everybody makes a horrible mess of it. |
| 00:51 |
trinque |
this is not to go all depressive. there are still good books to be read. Keene's Object Oriented Programming in Common Lisp is good. |
| 00:51 |
trinque |
There is also The Art of the Metaobject Protocol. |
| 00:51 |
trinque |
a woman beckons to zip up her dress, bbl! |
| 00:51 |
trinque |
after unzipping, of course |
| |
~ 17 hours 52 minutes ~ |
| 18:43 |
whaack |
trinque: Thanks. I'm not at a point where I could determine what in your code is/isn't idiosyncratic. I'm not even so sure what idiosyncratic means if there is no such thing as exemplar lisp. I'll take a look through those books though, thank you. |