00:00 |
mod6 |
i agree on philosophy though. why build something that is dependant on something undereath? how does that get one somewhere? |
00:00 |
asciilifeform |
mod6: see, i tell people, 'trinary logic, clockless Muller gates, direct execution of high-level language.' |
00:00 |
asciilifeform |
and they say 'you're a nut. we wanna get stuff done Right Now.' |
00:01 |
asciilifeform |
software sucks because hardware sucks. 'you can't pour a bullet from shit.' |
00:02 |
mod6 |
haha |
00:03 |
asciilifeform |
http://www.loper-os.org/?p=55 |
00:03 |
ozbot |
Loper OS » You have made your bedrock, now lie in it. |
00:04 |
mod6 |
i mean, the idea of a 'successor of unix' is appleaing to me, eventhough I <3 *nix (in general compared to whatever, windows). it would be amazing to have something abstracted to the level where it can handle physical systems and be virtualized too and be next gen |
00:04 |
assbot |
AMAZING COMPANY! |
00:05 |
mod6 |
lol asciilifeform |
00:05 |
mod6 |
err assbot |
00:05 |
asciilifeform |
mod6: once you understand how much of what you presently know will be irrelevant (actually, harmful) after a serious rethinking of computing, you'll shit yourself. |
00:06 |
asciilifeform |
don't worry, not much risk of it actually happening in real life. |
00:07 |
asciilifeform |
just try telling people: 'yes, you'll have to throw away your RAM. and every line of code anyone's ever written.' |
00:07 |
mod6 |
isn't it exciting? |
00:07 |
asciilifeform |
exciting, until you realize 1) it won't happen, and 2) it must |
00:08 |
mod6 |
if it must, it will |
00:08 |
asciilifeform |
qwerty's still here. |
00:09 |
asciilifeform |
people will put up with astounding levels of dysfunction because 'they want to get things done.' |
00:09 |
mod6 |
hahaha. yah but people are creatures of habit. but thats only because it's been allowed to persist. if people were only given type A new keyboard (dvorak) then that'd be used. kinda like only left hockey sticks in soivet union. |
00:11 |
mod6 |
i never personally switched to dvorak because the friend that i have who did had the issue of trying to constantly switch everyone elses computer to dvorak if he wanted to use it. |
00:11 |
mod6 |
muscle memory is a bitch |
00:11 |
mod6 |
i guess this might not be relevant. |
00:13 |
mod6 |
so what if we got to a point where we needed to throw everything existing away (now), how we would we proceed? |
00:13 |
mod6 |
we'd simply only have a lesson in what not to do. |
00:13 |
mod6 |
but we wouldn't have a map in what to do, only what not to do. |
00:19 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2050 @ 0.00082163 = 1.6843 BTC [-] |
00:21 |
mod6 |
asciilifeform: so we must go back to the form of the turing machine or DFA to re-invent the modern os? or do you think even that must be re-thought because of the possibility of quantum computers? |
00:25 |
mod6 |
( i like this thread, even if it leads no-where in particular. just curious, searching for ideas. ) |
00:26 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [HIM] 103 @ 0.05263204 = 5.4211 BTC [+] {3} |
00:28 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [HIM] 10 @ 0.05260001 = 0.526 BTC [-] |
00:35 |
mod6 |
ahh i see your comment and reply in that article: I believe that efficiency in computer design is a false god. Give me an “inefficient” but responsive and “Seven-Laws Compliant” computer any day of the week in place of the monstrous PC, that race car which regards steering wheel input as mere advice and so eagerly speeds off cliffs and into embankments. << hahaha |
00:41 |
mod6 |
i agree, there has to be a better way. |
00:48 |
mod6 |
anyway, i guess i'll get back to it. thanks for the convo. |
| |
~ 18 minutes ~ |
01:06 |
KRS1 |
http://paste2.org/6tY0zHY9 |
01:06 |
KRS1 |
oops |
01:07 |
KRS1 |
I meant http://cdn.meme.li/i/pekig.jpg |
01:12 |
KRS1 |
lul |
| |
~ 28 minutes ~ |
01:40 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.8795995 BTC [+] |
01:46 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 14 @ 0.0079 = 0.1106 BTC [-] |
01:14 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 912 @ 0.00082163 = 0.7493 BTC [-] |
| |
~ 15 minutes ~ |
01:29 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 10 @ 0.87963928 = 8.7964 BTC [+] {4} |
| |
~ 44 minutes ~ |
02:14 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 111 @ 0.007909 = 0.8779 BTC [+] {3} |
02:25 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 3 @ 0.15 = 0.45 BTC [-] |
02:26 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [VTX] 1 @ 0.389898 BTC [+] |
02:28 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [VTX] 1 @ 0.389899 BTC [+] |
02:31 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [HIM] 6 @ 0.0599 = 0.3594 BTC [+] |
02:42 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 105 @ 0.00814571 = 0.8553 BTC [+] {2} |
02:44 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 6 @ 0.80173333 = 4.8104 BTC [-] {4} |
02:52 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 16 @ 0.00815 = 0.1304 BTC [+] |
| |
~ 42 minutes ~ |
03:35 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 5750 @ 0.00081943 = 4.7117 BTC [-] |
| |
~ 43 minutes ~ |
04:19 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 40 @ 0.00765473 = 0.3062 BTC [-] {4} |
04:31 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6037 @ 0.00081794 = 4.9379 BTC [-] |
| |
~ 1 hours 17 minutes ~ |
05:48 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 304 @ 0.00109498 = 0.3329 BTC [-] |
05:49 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 500 @ 0.00109498 = 0.5475 BTC [-] |
05:51 |
jurov |
;;bc,stats |
05:52 |
gribble |
Current Blocks: 267686 | Current Difficulty: 3.9092878763808584E8 | Next Difficulty At Block: 268127 | Next Difficulty In: 441 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 2 days, 5 hours, 43 minutes, and 33 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 511949177.601 | Estimated Percent Change: 30.95714 |
| |
~ 36 minutes ~ |
06:28 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4033 @ 0.00081943 = 3.3048 BTC [+] |
06:31 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 3 @ 0.8 = 2.4 BTC [-] |
06:36 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 16424 @ 0.00081844 = 13.4421 BTC [-] {4} |
06:44 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 108 @ 0.00765194 = 0.8264 BTC [-] {2} |
06:45 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 136 @ 0.00762073 = 1.0364 BTC [-] {3} |
06:53 |
truffles |
someone's internet is broken |
| |
~ 52 minutes ~ |
07:45 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11383 @ 0.00082169 = 9.3533 BTC [+] |
07:59 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [XBOND] [PAID] 0.69348300 BTC to 1`386`966 shares, 50 satoshi per share |
08:03 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [NEOBEE] 179 @ 0.00273072 = 0.4888 BTC [-] {2} |
08:11 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 1 @ 0.15 BTC [-] |
08:12 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 30 @ 0.0078 = 0.234 BTC [+] |
08:24 |
pankkake |
http://www.rootwyrm.com/2013/11/the-badbios-analysis-is-wrong/ |
08:27 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.77000005 BTC [-] |
08:40 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 15 @ 0.75933333 = 11.39 BTC [-] {4} |
08:40 |
kakobrekla |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-EIBY-OUwU |
08:41 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 105 @ 0.0076502 = 0.8033 BTC [-] |
08:41 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.75 BTC [-] |
08:42 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 108 @ 0.00765009 = 0.8262 BTC [-] {4} |
08:42 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.75 BTC [-] |
08:44 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 96 @ 0.0076501 = 0.7344 BTC [+] |
08:44 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.75 BTC [-] |
| |
~ 21 minutes ~ |
09:05 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2000 @ 0.00082101 = 1.642 BTC [-] {2} |
| |
~ 24 minutes ~ |
09:30 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 2000 @ 0.00109498 = 2.19 BTC [-] |
09:35 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11800 @ 0.00081929 = 9.6676 BTC [-] {2} |
09:35 |
Diablo-D3 |
Ukyo: hey, at some point can you delist DMC? the nov 1st deadline has passed |
09:39 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 628 @ 0.00109 = 0.6845 BTC [-] |
09:42 |
Ukyo |
what does the us user deadline have to do with DMC ? |
09:45 |
Diablo-D3 |
Ukyo: I set it to the same date. |
| |
~ 50 minutes ~ |
10:36 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 37 @ 0.00762 = 0.2819 BTC [-] {2} |
10:39 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 179 @ 0.0072901 = 1.3049 BTC [-] {5} |
10:42 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [NEOBEE] 100 @ 0.002779 = 0.2779 BTC [+] |
10:46 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 100 @ 0.00109498 = 0.1095 BTC [+] |
| |
~ 22 minutes ~ |
11:09 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.77 BTC [+] |
11:12 |
nubbins` |
hi |
11:13 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6600 @ 0.00081632 = 5.3877 BTC [-] |
11:16 |
nubbins` |
;;seen KRS1 |
11:16 |
gribble |
KRS1 was last seen in #bitcoin-assets 11 hours, 3 minutes, and 42 seconds ago: <KRS1> lul |
11:17 |
nubbins` |
;;later tell KRS1 professionally, i've coded in VB.NET, C#, java, objective-c, plus web-dev-related things like html/xml, js, and sql |
11:17 |
gribble |
The operation succeeded. |
11:17 |
nubbins` |
i actually have no idea how ;;later tell works, you know |
11:17 |
nubbins` |
anyway, that's in response to http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=02-11-2013#366712 |
11:18 |
nubbins` |
and as a further response, i'd sooner put my eyes out than work in IT again |
11:23 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.77 BTC [+] |
11:28 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 3 @ 0.77000005 = 2.31 BTC [+] |
11:29 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 34 @ 0.00779982 = 0.2652 BTC [+] {2} |
11:41 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.8 BTC [+] |
11:43 |
mod6 |
;;ticker |
11:43 |
gribble |
MtGox BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 217.10102, Best ask: 217.68451, Bid-ask spread: 0.58349, Last trade: 217.10102, 24 hour volume: 5123.54629150, 24 hour low: 211.25000, 24 hour high: 218.00000, 24 hour vwap: 215.26331 |
11:45 |
nubbins` |
yes now |
11:45 |
nubbins` |
;;ticker --market all |
11:45 |
nubbins` |
hm |
11:45 |
gribble |
MtGox BTCUSD last: 218.00001, vol: 5143.70604610 | Bitstamp BTCUSD last: 206.20, vol: 6099.18382697 | BTC-E BTCUSD last: 203.112, vol: 6443.37397 | Bitfinex BTCUSD last: 215.0, vol: 2431.08005992 | CampBX BTCUSD last: 199.00, vol: 188.94107072 | BTCChina BTCUSD last: 213.1181982, vol: 7764.44100000 | Volume-weighted last average: 210.280682296 |
11:47 |
nubbins` |
not too shabby |
11:48 |
nubbins` |
AM1 made it all the way to 0.88 earlier, i guess people are really expecting a lot of suckers to buy those new box erupters or whatever they're called |
11:51 |
Jere_Jones |
I'm not even sure those are new. Sounds suspiciously like 3 blades in a box to me. |
11:51 |
nubbins` |
nod |
11:52 |
nubbins` |
priced suspiciously like 3 blades in a box, too |
11:52 |
nubbins` |
same bad idea with a different pretty bow on it |
11:53 |
Jere_Jones |
Don't get me wrong, I want ASICMiner to succeed. But I don't think the box is news. |
11:53 |
nubbins` |
i'm ambivalent about their success |
11:53 |
nubbins` |
do you want the banks who offered sub-prime mortgages to succeed? |
11:53 |
nubbins` |
take a moment to examine the parallels |
11:54 |
Jere_Jones |
In both cases, I believe my answer would be yes. Because my financial well-being is related to both. |
11:55 |
nubbins` |
heh |
11:55 |
nubbins` |
your honesty is refreshing |
11:55 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 20 @ 0.71795 = 14.359 BTC [-] {8} |
11:56 |
Jere_Jones |
I'm not *happy* about needing BoA to not fail. But I would be in a bad spot if it did. |
11:56 |
nubbins` |
i don't think that many of the people bleating in the AM threads on btctalk have the same level of clarity |
11:56 |
nubbins` |
in fact, if one were to suggest to them that they're attempting to enrich themselves to the direct detriment of others, they'd proably be very surprised |
11:57 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 63 @ 0.00729051 = 0.4593 BTC [-] |
11:58 |
Jere_Jones |
Let's be clear, I don't want BoA to succeed *because* they are issuing mortgages to people who can't afford them. I want BoA to succeed *because* they have my money. |
11:59 |
Jere_Jones |
And, as far as I can tell, there aren't any real good options when it comes to banks. |
11:59 |
nubbins` |
there's always credit unions, i guess |
12:00 |
nubbins` |
although i think the banking system in america is very different from here in canada. |
12:00 |
nubbins` |
we've got what, five or six banks? and a bunch of credit unions |
12:01 |
Jere_Jones |
We've got a ton of banks and they all suck. |
12:02 |
Jere_Jones |
Of course, the vast majority of them are really just fronts for the big ones. Switching to one of them would be the equivalent of switching from Sprint to Ting. |
12:02 |
Jere_Jones |
Different name. Same assholes. |
12:02 |
nubbins` |
yeah |
12:02 |
nubbins` |
and the oppressor grows larger still |
12:03 |
nubbins` |
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1prngs/look_what_came_in_the_mail_today/ |
12:03 |
ozbot |
Look what came in the mail today. : Bitcoin |
12:03 |
nubbins` |
first comment, hahaha |
12:03 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 230 @ 0.00727665 = 1.6736 BTC [-] {4} |
12:07 |
b0n1 |
:) |
12:07 |
truffles |
if only that bitcoin thing could be used as money |
12:11 |
nubbins` |
yes, if only |
12:11 |
truffles |
" a bitcoin condom machine.." that was a good one |
12:14 |
nubbins` |
there was a guy selling pregnancy tests on the forum |
12:14 |
nubbins` |
along with flush kits |
12:15 |
truffles |
not that many women on the internet |
12:15 |
truffles |
he is in for a bad time |
12:16 |
truffles |
oh wait nerds can has gf too nm |
12:19 |
truffles |
is nerd a negative word to nerds ? |
12:20 |
truffles |
i personally dont consider myself one ldo |
12:22 |
pankkake |
it's probably like nigga. nerds can say nerd |
12:24 |
truffles |
well some ppl like showing off their knowledge like on "king of the nerds" tv show |
12:24 |
truffles |
n word not on the same scale imo |
12:35 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [CBTC] 1500 @ 0.0002445 = 0.3668 BTC [+] |
12:38 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [CBTC] 1000 @ 0.0002445 = 0.2445 BTC [+] |
| |
~ 18 minutes ~ |
12:56 |
truffles |
well im not smart enough for the nerd title otherwise i see no probs with it, but ofc some ppl are sensitive about this stuff |
13:00 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 246 @ 0.00109498 = 0.2694 BTC [+] |
13:11 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 360 @ 0.00109498 = 0.3942 BTC [+] |
13:17 |
truffles |
must sleep |
13:19 |
benkay |
nubbs how do you obtain food credits outside of IT these days? |
13:20 |
nubbins` |
i run a print studio |
13:20 |
kakobrekla |
did you do the snsa shirt? |
13:21 |
nubbins` |
printed them, yes. didn't design the image |
13:21 |
kakobrekla |
cool |
13:21 |
nubbins` |
agreed :D |
13:21 |
kakobrekla |
i heard im getting some! |
13:22 |
benkay |
bought some cardanos, kakobrekla? |
13:22 |
nubbins` |
ah! you must be one of the slovenia/slovakia packages i'm guessing? |
13:22 |
kakobrekla |
benkay not yet |
13:22 |
kakobrekla |
nubbins` yeah that one, somalia it was i reckon |
13:22 |
nubbins` |
heh |
13:22 |
benkay |
i'm still mulling over how to integrate cardanos into my existing key mgmt scheme |
13:23 |
nubbins` |
i'm much more interested in flatstock than fabric these days |
13:23 |
kakobrekla |
like papery stuff? |
13:23 |
nubbins` |
yeah |
13:23 |
nubbins` |
paper, wood, w/e |
13:24 |
kakobrekla |
benkay yeah ill get one or two and then later figure out what to do with them |
13:24 |
nubbins` |
received a large order of paper on friday, can't wait to start testing it out |
13:24 |
nubbins` |
all 100% cotton. some of it is black :0 |
13:24 |
kakobrekla |
cotton paper? |
13:24 |
nubbins` |
yep. acid-free, archival quality |
13:24 |
nubbins` |
none of this dead-tree bullshit ;) |
13:25 |
kakobrekla |
ok but you are not a treehugger or ? |
13:25 |
nubbins` |
no more so than the average sensible human |
13:25 |
nubbins` |
tree paper just isn't as nice |
13:25 |
kakobrekla |
well cotton is a bitch too |
13:26 |
nubbins` |
maybe so, but it makes fine paper |
13:29 |
mod6 |
;;ticker |
13:30 |
gribble |
MtGox BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 220.00000, Best ask: 220.09774, Bid-ask spread: 0.09774, Last trade: 220.00000, 24 hour volume: 7213.48975184, 24 hour low: 211.70001, 24 hour high: 220.09774, 24 hour vwap: 216.59082 |
13:37 |
kakobrekla |
here, have a rainbow http://jezus.si:81/render?target=bitcoin.*.transactions&height=500&width=1100&lineMode=connected |
13:37 |
kakobrekla |
stamp is laging, not only teh cans and strings but teh price too |
13:48 |
mod6 |
nice chart. someone has a pretty good bid in @ 195 on bitstamp. |
13:52 |
mod6 |
well, guess its $193.03: |
13:53 |
mod6 |
$193.03 3619.12508000 $698,599.71 |
13:55 |
nubbins` |
oh my |
13:57 |
nubbins` |
never gonna get filled, that's just there to give people confidence that the ass isn't gonna fall out of it |
14:03 |
Pantoo |
I see ken was exaggerating about the SEC and mislead everyone who has been building off of his statement... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=297503.msg3430985#msg3430985 |
14:04 |
pankkake |
ken mislead people? how surprising |
14:04 |
Pantoo |
hahaha |
14:04 |
pankkake |
http://www.angelfoodcomic.com/wp-content/uploads/I-have-no-idea-what-I-am-doing.jpg ActimeMining in a nutshell |
14:05 |
Pantoo |
i was looking to see if he had said anything else about the SEC and noticed he made that update earlier. wonder how long till others notice |
| |
~ 15 minutes ~ |
14:20 |
nubbins` |
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg3467862#msg3467862 |
14:20 |
ozbot |
ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It |
14:20 |
nubbins` |
lel |
14:26 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 2 @ 0.78899999 = 1.578 BTC [+] |
14:27 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [HIM] 8 @ 0.059 = 0.472 BTC [-] |
14:30 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 3500 @ 0.00109498 = 3.8324 BTC [+] {2} |
14:38 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9900 @ 0.00081266 = 8.0453 BTC [-] |
| |
~ 36 minutes ~ |
15:15 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [HIM] 5 @ 0.059 = 0.295 BTC [-] |
15:23 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9450 @ 0.00081336 = 7.6863 BTC [+] |
| |
~ 22 minutes ~ |
15:45 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9074 @ 0.0008163 = 7.4071 BTC [+] |
15:49 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 1000 @ 0.00109498 = 1.095 BTC [+] |
| |
~ 16 minutes ~ |
16:05 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9000 @ 0.00081258 = 7.3132 BTC [-] {2} |
16:17 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 130 @ 0.00728141 = 0.9466 BTC [-] {3} |
16:17 |
jurov |
nubbins`: did you declare sufficiently high value for our watchful customs to intercept it and demand ransom? |
16:18 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 63 @ 0.0072744 = 0.4583 BTC [-] |
16:18 |
nubbins` |
the postal clerk filled out all the customs forms for me. pretty sure they're all marked as "t-shirt", gift, no cash value |
16:20 |
jurov |
good. cuz americans like, in their blessed innocece, to declare $$$$ value and then it's headache |
16:20 |
jurov |
*innocence |
16:21 |
nubbins` |
i sold some poor EU guy a rare casascius coin a while back. he insisted on insuring it for its full value, and was very sad when he had to pay hundreds of dollars before they released his package |
16:21 |
mircea_popescu |
innocaecity |
16:21 |
nubbins` |
innococracy |
16:22 |
pankkake |
that's why I don't like to order stuff outside of the EU :/ |
16:22 |
mircea_popescu |
btw i answered your comments noobins :D |
16:22 |
pankkake |
also stuff has a tendency to disappear at the border |
16:32 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 31 @ 0.00759999 = 0.2356 BTC [+] |
16:34 |
nubbins` |
mircea_popescu: just finished; we're *all* misrepresenting the situation. the artists, the art dealers, the museum-going public, and every single person who commented on that post, yourself included. this is why "what is art" is an interesting topic for discussion; everyone colors it with their own experience. |
16:34 |
mircea_popescu |
no, you're all doing it except me. |
16:34 |
mircea_popescu |
you know this because i can enact my point in your system, but you can't enact your point in mine. |
16:35 |
mircea_popescu |
in all situations where a set of representations appears equivalent but one excludes all others, that's also the correct one, and the others are degenerate. |
16:36 |
nubbins` |
i'm still trying to figure out if i should determine the nature of your point or the nature of your system first! |
16:38 |
mircea_popescu |
lol good point. |
16:40 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.775 BTC [-] |
16:41 |
nubbins` |
anyway, certainly one of the more entertaining reads (article + comments) so far |
16:42 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 5 @ 0.77999998 = 3.9 BTC [+] {2} |
16:42 |
mircea_popescu |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=753nCv6tl2s |
16:42 |
ozbot |
By special request, the Imperial March on Kazoo - YouTube |
16:43 |
nubbins` |
*blink* |
16:43 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 7 @ 0.7931355 = 5.5519 BTC [+] {4} |
16:44 |
nubbins` |
that's quite the outfit |
16:46 |
mircea_popescu |
it's kinda what i think when i hear star wars. |
16:46 |
mircea_popescu |
that guy. |
16:47 |
nubbins` |
a reasonable enough representation |
16:53 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [CBTC] 5899 @ 0.00021142 = 1.2472 BTC [-] {9} |
17:07 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 826 @ 0.00081437 = 0.6727 BTC [+] |
17:10 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [HIM] 17 @ 0.059 = 1.003 BTC [+] |
17:12 |
jurov |
the correct one, and the others are degenerate *rolls eyes* |
17:13 |
mircea_popescu |
jurov im super cereal. |
17:14 |
nubbins` |
i'm curious to know what your description of my system would be |
17:16 |
jurov |
"lurk moar" |
17:17 |
mircea_popescu |
he was asking you neh ? |
17:17 |
nubbins` |
nope, that was directed towards you |
17:18 |
nubbins` |
you can't claim to know a man's mind and not expect him to ask you to elaborate |
17:18 |
mircea_popescu |
ah. well i wouldn't know "your" system. what you've written so far is coherent with naive nominalism, ie the ideology of all youths. occam requires it be described as such. |
17:20 |
mircea_popescu |
(naive nominalism is the view that convention enacts existence, and thus forumers are "ceo"s and their harebrained schemes "companies") |
17:21 |
mircea_popescu |
that aside, there aren't really enough points given explicitly to make much of a call. |
17:22 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 60 @ 0.00726548 = 0.4359 BTC [-] {3} |
17:22 |
nubbins` |
and thus, random bozos are "artists"? |
17:23 |
mircea_popescu |
if you call them that. |
17:23 |
nubbins` |
if the random bozo creates something that i like, what else would i call him? |
17:24 |
mircea_popescu |
but there's a difference between calling a dude a nigger for convenience, as the shortest word available, |
17:24 |
mircea_popescu |
and calling a dude a nigger for racism. |
17:27 |
nubbins` |
i dunno, man. maybe i'm applying too much of my interpretation of your "system" into your words, but it seems like you're flat-out stating that it's not art unless someone in a position of power or influence over the artist decrees it to be so |
17:27 |
mircea_popescu |
no, i am flat out stating that. |
17:27 |
nubbins` |
and i find such a stance so bizarre that i'm not even sure where to begin picking it apart |
17:28 |
mircea_popescu |
i know. |
17:29 |
nubbins` |
about five years ago, i moved into an apartment and found a large piece of wall panelling with a picture painted on the back side of it. it's currently gracing the wall of my living room. |
17:29 |
nubbins` |
no name, no identifying marks whatsoever, no way for me to ever find out who made it or to contact them in any way |
17:30 |
nubbins` |
to propose that i hold any position relative to its creator, above or below, is simply nonsense |
17:30 |
nubbins` |
and yet, there it sits on my wall |
17:30 |
nubbins` |
unequivocally and inarguably a work of art |
17:31 |
mircea_popescu |
"unequivocally and inarguably a work of art" only in the republic of one constructed by your own living room, of which you are president. |
17:31 |
nubbins` |
YES |
17:31 |
nubbins` |
my fucking point exactly |
17:31 |
mircea_popescu |
why do you expect solipsism to be considered by others ? |
17:32 |
mircea_popescu |
your problem, not apt to be brought to the forum. |
17:33 |
mircea_popescu |
for that matter, you may perhaps in time come to own a miniature of the eiffel tower, which you may emplace on your commode, |
17:33 |
mircea_popescu |
or in your rectum. |
17:33 |
mircea_popescu |
it'd be "the eiffel tower of my commode", but only inasmuch as you are concerned. |
17:33 |
nubbins` |
sure |
17:33 |
mircea_popescu |
it's not germane to call it "the eiffel tower" in conversation. |
17:34 |
nubbins` |
well, you're the one bringing definite articles into play |
17:34 |
nubbins` |
it's not THE art on my walls, it's A piece of art |
17:34 |
mircea_popescu |
yes, because i am the one discussing art, |
17:34 |
mircea_popescu |
not whatever irreelvant stuff you're personally dreaming up all for yourself. |
17:34 |
mircea_popescu |
the eiffel tower on yoru commode is not a piece of eiffel towers. |
17:35 |
nubbins` |
everything is irrelevant but the opinion of the observer |
17:35 |
mircea_popescu |
it has literally nothing to do with the eiffel tower. |
17:35 |
mircea_popescu |
no. |
17:35 |
nubbins` |
yes. |
17:35 |
nubbins` |
universally, no |
17:35 |
mircea_popescu |
well so there you have it. |
17:35 |
nubbins` |
but as a matter of determining whether it's art, yes |
17:35 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 3216 @ 0.00081476 = 2.6203 BTC [+] |
17:35 |
mircea_popescu |
there are qualifications needed to be an observer. you don't become an observer of the battle of thermopylae just by stating yourself as an observer |
17:35 |
nubbins` |
oh, you most certainly do |
17:36 |
nubbins` |
an observer needs no qualifications beyond the ability to observe |
17:36 |
nubbins` |
the validity of their observations can certainly be debated |
17:36 |
mircea_popescu |
this may be the best stating of the naive nominalism discussed above. |
17:36 |
nubbins` |
just as the validity of what my opinion of art is can be debated |
17:36 |
mircea_popescu |
you presume youy have the faculty to observe. |
17:36 |
mircea_popescu |
this presumption is wholly unsubstantiated. |
17:37 |
nubbins` |
art doesn't exist in a vacuum |
17:37 |
dexX7 |
observer? http://trilema.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/mircea-popescu-gpl-3.jpg |
17:37 |
nubbins` |
you touched on this when you said it was inert |
17:38 |
nubbins` |
but that's just another way of questioning whether an event happens if there is no observer |
17:38 |
nubbins` |
trees falling, noises being made, etc |
17:38 |
nubbins` |
and that's fair in the sense that art is some sort of schrodinger's cat type thing |
17:39 |
nubbins` |
where it's neither art nor not-art until someone looks at it |
17:39 |
mircea_popescu |
nah, see, the equivocation at work here is that the requirements for being an observer in the foresrt with a falling tree are very low |
17:39 |
nubbins` |
but the difference here is that all can agree on whether or not a cat is dead |
17:39 |
nubbins` |
because that's quantifiable |
17:39 |
mircea_popescu |
one can't turn arround and expect all situations have equally low bars |
17:39 |
nubbins` |
none can agree on whether or not X is art |
17:39 |
nubbins` |
because it's simply not quantifiable |
17:39 |
mircea_popescu |
dexX7 jus' me an' my hat. |
17:40 |
nubbins` |
how many arts is Starry Night? how many arts is Fountain? |
17:40 |
dexX7 |
https://www.google.com/search?q=fringe+observer but i'm sure you know ;) |
17:40 |
mircea_popescu |
dexX7 whassat ? |
17:41 |
mircea_popescu |
nubbins` i dunno what cats have to do with this. is it an internet thing ? |
17:41 |
dexX7 |
fringe is a us tv series |
17:42 |
nubbins` |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger's_cat |
17:42 |
nubbins` |
due to quantum physics gibberish, the cat is neither dead nor alive until observed |
17:43 |
nubbins` |
the natural extrapolation of your argument is that you can walk up to a woman weeping at the beauty of a painting, or of a spoken word, and politely inform her that what she has observed is, in fact, not art |
17:43 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 6 @ 0.15 = 0.9 BTC [-] |
17:43 |
nubbins` |
but the very fact that she weeps implies that she is having a strong emotional response to it |
17:44 |
nubbins` |
which in turn implies that she |
17:44 |
nubbins` |
oh fuck i smell smoke hold on |
17:47 |
mircea_popescu |
nubbins` you could slap her, or kidnap her to the same strong emotional response |
17:47 |
mircea_popescu |
"what literature pays best ?" "ransom notes" |
17:48 |
mircea_popescu |
more's the point : your example is counterfactual. i would never talk to some anodyne serf woman, |
17:48 |
nubbins` |
and there are those who would argue that such a kidnapping is "performance art" |
17:48 |
mircea_popescu |
you might as well propose the cancer walk in the front door one day and begin jacking off. |
17:49 |
nubbins` |
i disagree, but my disagreement merely illustrates my point |
17:49 |
mircea_popescu |
"jacking off" ?! it has no penis. |
17:50 |
nubbins` |
i'm merely offering the simplest explanation for the fact that there are so many things which some people call art and other people don't |
17:50 |
mircea_popescu |
incidentally, the miscasting as art as "that which yields emotional response" is roughly the reason trolling has become such a big deal culturally. |
17:50 |
mircea_popescu |
nubbins` yes, but your explanation requires people be equal and interchangeable, which is beyond naive. |
17:51 |
mircea_popescu |
you might as well offer an explanation of art for spherical chickens that live in vacuums. |
17:51 |
nubbins` |
your explanation requires that some higher power declares X to be art and Y to be not-art |
17:51 |
nubbins` |
which is pretty lelly |
17:52 |
nubbins` |
suppose person X says "this sculpture i've commissioned is art" and person Y says "nay, you are my subject, and i declare it to be not-art" |
17:53 |
nubbins` |
well, obviously person Z (X and Y's superior) should be the REAL person to ask, right? |
17:53 |
nubbins` |
and so on and so on |
17:53 |
nubbins` |
and you arrive at the conclusion that art is declared by edict from god |
17:54 |
nubbins` |
or, y'know, occam's razor. it's art if i think it's art. |
17:54 |
nubbins` |
the obvious implication is that the words "to me" are inserted between "art" and "if" |
17:55 |
mircea_popescu |
except no one cares about any "to me" sentence. they're voiceless. |
17:55 |
nubbins` |
because there's no other way to quantify it, and if you can't quantify things, you certainly can't classify them |
17:56 |
nubbins` |
sure, but what does that change? |
17:56 |
mircea_popescu |
looky, this trick where you go "mpex is too hard, i don;'t understand it ; therefore we must all glbse because there's no other way to do it" isn't logically sound. |
17:56 |
mircea_popescu |
it is the avatar of youth, but so are many other illogical topoi |
17:56 |
nubbins` |
someone says a piss pot "is art to me". i don't care, because whether it's art to them has no bearing on whether it's art to me |
17:56 |
mircea_popescu |
the "to me" approach is unsound. this disqualifies it, perpetually and definitively. |
17:57 |
mircea_popescu |
the remainder is the "to whom ?" approach, which reduces to social hierarchy. |
17:57 |
mircea_popescu |
no problem here. |
17:57 |
nubbins` |
art acts on people. without "to me", it does not exist |
17:57 |
mircea_popescu |
you presume all action is with the voluntary subjection fo the subject |
17:57 |
mircea_popescu |
this may be true, but the subjection needn't be conscious. |
17:58 |
nubbins` |
agreed |
17:58 |
mircea_popescu |
you don't discuss surgery in terms of the subjective impressions of patients. a similar discussion of any other craft is similarly out of place. |
17:58 |
mircea_popescu |
obviously the surgeons are surgeons by decree rather than because "people" feel surgeonized by them |
17:58 |
nubbins` |
surgery definitely falls into the realm of the quantifiable. |
17:58 |
mircea_popescu |
only in the minds of people who have no idea what it is. |
17:59 |
mircea_popescu |
in point of fact it's about as vague as art. |
17:59 |
mircea_popescu |
which is why malpraxis is such a mess. |
17:59 |
nubbins` |
"you're cured if i say you're cured" |
17:59 |
mircea_popescu |
exactly. |
17:59 |
nubbins` |
"it's art if i tell you it's art" |
17:59 |
mircea_popescu |
if and only if, when and only when. |
18:00 |
nubbins` |
"i'm cured if my condition is gone" |
18:00 |
mircea_popescu |
does the oncology patient go "all is well doc, i feel cured" ? |
18:00 |
nubbins` |
"it's art if i say it's art" |
18:00 |
mircea_popescu |
no, they go o please divine my fortunes, good master. |
18:00 |
nubbins` |
"cured" has nothing to do with feeling |
18:00 |
mircea_popescu |
it's quite a case of "you're cured if and when i say you're cured". |
18:00 |
nubbins` |
art has much to do with it |
18:00 |
mircea_popescu |
with feeling, perhaps. with conscious feeling rarely. |
18:01 |
nubbins` |
hmm |
18:01 |
mircea_popescu |
when i say "it's art because X feels Y" i may be right. when you say "it's art because I feel Y" you're certain to be wrong. |
18:02 |
nubbins` |
mp says it's art because nubbins wept, vs nubbins says it's art because nubbins wept |
18:02 |
mircea_popescu |
to be formal, |
18:03 |
nubbins` |
same conclusion, different route |
18:03 |
mircea_popescu |
mp said it's art, and it makes nubbins weep, vs nubbins thinks it;'s art because that's why he thinks he wept |
18:03 |
nubbins` |
... |
18:03 |
mircea_popescu |
these are not the same. and for that matter the latter's logically unsound. |
18:04 |
mircea_popescu |
(in nubbins' instance, not in the general form) |
18:04 |
nubbins` |
you changed your example a bit there |
18:04 |
mircea_popescu |
how ? |
18:04 |
nubbins` |
you went from "because x feels y" to "and x feels y" |
18:05 |
nubbins` |
mp said it's art because it makes nubbins weep, or mp said it's art and it makes nubbins weep? |
18:05 |
mircea_popescu |
there is no because in the correct statement. in fact, we can judge how good a nubbins you are by how adequately you weep when art is presented |
18:05 |
mircea_popescu |
NOT the other way around, judge art by how it "makes" you weep or not. |
18:06 |
nubbins` |
well, obviously it's not the art but nubbins himself that is the cause of the weeping |
18:06 |
mircea_popescu |
nope. |
18:06 |
nubbins` |
but let's not get tangled up |
18:06 |
mircea_popescu |
this naive "man at center of everything" goes well with the naive nominalism, but it's quite as nutty. |
18:07 |
nubbins` |
let's examine "mp said it's art" |
18:07 |
mircea_popescu |
ok. |
18:07 |
nubbins` |
presumably mp has criteria? |
18:07 |
mircea_popescu |
none of your business as they may be,. |
18:07 |
mircea_popescu |
presumably he does. |
18:07 |
nubbins` |
sure. nevertheless, we can presume that he does |
18:07 |
mircea_popescu |
yea. |
18:07 |
nubbins` |
we can also presume that nubbins also has criteria |
18:07 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 24950 @ 0.00081405 = 20.3105 BTC [-] {2} |
18:07 |
mircea_popescu |
why ? |
18:08 |
nubbins` |
as a facile counterpoint, why not? |
18:08 |
mircea_popescu |
because it's not only facile, but wrong. |
18:08 |
nubbins` |
surely there must be something that makes mp a good judge and nubbins a poor one? |
18:08 |
mircea_popescu |
mp is one of the lords. he makes art be. of course we can presume anything. |
18:08 |
nubbins` |
ahahaha |
18:08 |
mircea_popescu |
nubbins is no such lord. we're going to have to explain why we presume. |
18:08 |
nubbins` |
it's art by holy edict! |
18:08 |
mircea_popescu |
that's the point of the article. |
18:09 |
nubbins` |
you're a complicated man |
| |
↖ |
18:09 |
mircea_popescu |
<nubbins`> surely there must be something that makes mp a good judge and nubbins a poor one? << this implies that perhaps nubbins could move upwards in society, and contains implicit an equivalency of substance between the two. this isn't an accepted point between us. |
18:09 |
mircea_popescu |
so if it's true, you'll have to prove it. |
18:10 |
nubbins` |
^ this implies that there's a ladder we're both on and you're above me on it |
18:10 |
nubbins` |
so if it's true, you'll have to prove it. |
18:10 |
mircea_popescu |
well not you and me personally |
18:10 |
mircea_popescu |
but the icons we're discussing |
18:10 |
nubbins` |
any two people |
18:10 |
nubbins` |
sure |
18:10 |
mircea_popescu |
i have to prove naught. i just make the art be art. |
18:12 |
nubbins` |
so you pop into someone's house, point to a painting, and say "actually that's not art at all", and thus it was never art |
18:12 |
mircea_popescu |
how would mp and nubbins socially interract ? |
18:12 |
nubbins` |
i'm not sure we would |
18:12 |
mircea_popescu |
i pop into someone's house by the intermediate agency of his wife which is now my slave |
18:13 |
mircea_popescu |
and she throws out all their old shit cause now she knows better. |
18:13 |
mircea_popescu |
"you know what ? my old junk wasn't art at all" |
18:13 |
nubbins` |
that could happen without any outside influence |
18:13 |
nubbins` |
and indeed it does, all the fucking time |
18:14 |
nubbins` |
in fact, it even happens in the other direction! |
18:14 |
nubbins` |
"hey, y'know, this album is actually pretty good" |
18:14 |
nubbins` |
"this drawing has really grown on me" |
18:14 |
mircea_popescu |
but this has little to do. you were discussing a particular application of the theory, with what i took as a view to reduce it to absurd. |
18:14 |
nubbins` |
everything is absurd. |
18:14 |
mircea_popescu |
i've shown the approach not to really work, we can move on |
18:15 |
nubbins` |
of course, absurdity is a spectrum |
18:15 |
mircea_popescu |
lol. |
18:15 |
nubbins` |
the entire sphere of art rests squarely on the more |
18:15 |
mircea_popescu |
the curse of this particular equalitarian-nominalism ogre is that it can't really make stateemnts. |
18:16 |
nubbins` |
"absurd" end of that spectrum |
18:16 |
nubbins` |
well, obviously, if you take my view, all art is a bit of a beat-off |
18:16 |
nubbins` |
an absurd, senseless beat-off |
18:18 |
nubbins` |
if one chooses to make himself an authority in such an arena, well, so be it |
18:18 |
pankkake |
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=322809.msg3474594#msg3474594 john k's not dead |
18:18 |
ozbot |
Where's John K? |
18:18 |
nubbins` |
but he deceives himself if he thinks he can avoid becoming part of the beat-off |
18:19 |
nubbins` |
after all, what's a bigger beat-off than "i'm the guy who sez what's art and what's not"? |
18:19 |
nubbins` |
it's enough to make your sides ache. |
18:20 |
mircea_popescu |
you know that seinfeld episode when george is pitching to the network nubbins ? |
18:21 |
nubbins` |
vague recollection, specifics are lost in the haze |
18:21 |
mircea_popescu |
"so what's this idea ?" "it's nothing" "Then why am I watching it ?" "because it's on tv" "not yet." |
18:21 |
mircea_popescu |
that's it right there. i'm the guy who sez. |
18:21 |
nubbins` |
not the best analogy |
18:22 |
nubbins` |
tv has gatekeepers |
18:22 |
nubbins` |
you wanna air a tv show, you need the permission of your master |
18:22 |
nubbins` |
you wanna paint something or write a song, you're limited only by your own level of ambition |
18:22 |
mircea_popescu |
ah, and "art" is free, |
18:22 |
mircea_popescu |
you just put it on etsy ? |
18:23 |
nubbins` |
etsy has listing fees ;) |
18:23 |
mircea_popescu |
but this sort of drawer novel, as it was known, doesn't exist in the sense of art. |
18:23 |
mircea_popescu |
it exists in the sense of masturbation, or w/e the author does in his privacy. |
18:23 |
nubbins` |
so it's art if it reaches an audience of a certain size |
18:24 |
mircea_popescu |
think of an old painting being discovered in a stahs. what is the question first and foremost asked ? is it something as to the paionting itself or is it as to the pedigree of the owner ? |
18:24 |
mircea_popescu |
nobody goes "i found a 500 year old kinda cool painting" |
18:24 |
mircea_popescu |
it only matters once it becomes "an old da vinci has been discovered" |
18:24 |
mircea_popescu |
audience has nothing to do with it. this is wholly a medieval-inspired problem of probatory. |
18:24 |
nubbins` |
nah |
18:25 |
nubbins` |
it matters to more people if it's an old davinci or what have you |
18:25 |
mircea_popescu |
if the shipwreck survivor found is a noble or a peasant, not if he owns a lot of farms and what havd you |
18:25 |
nubbins` |
but that doesn't preclude it mattering to anyone |
18:25 |
mircea_popescu |
if you insist to hold the utopian view. |
18:25 |
nubbins` |
oh, but i do! |
18:26 |
nubbins` |
we're all floating in a void |
18:27 |
mircea_popescu |
well the advantage of holding nonsense views (which utopianisms are by definiton) is that anything can be derived from them. |
18:27 |
mircea_popescu |
any conclusion is available to the inconsistent set of premises. |
18:27 |
nubbins` |
the magazines at the grocery store tell me that kim kardashian is very worthy of my attention, but that's simply false |
18:27 |
nubbins` |
well, yes. |
18:27 |
nubbins` |
what's more nonsense than debating whether or not something is art? |
18:28 |
mircea_popescu |
there can be no such debate. |
18:28 |
nubbins` |
or whether or not X or Y is a criteria for defining it? |
18:28 |
mircea_popescu |
art is art. you disagree, you may be punished by your lord. end of story. |
18:28 |
nubbins` |
or whether or not art exists? |
18:28 |
nubbins` |
or whether person X or person Y is an authority on the subject? |
18:29 |
nubbins` |
unadulterated nonsense, all of it |
18:29 |
mircea_popescu |
so if you don't really wish to discuss art, why are you ? |
18:29 |
nubbins` |
regardless of a self-appointed lord's opinion |
18:29 |
nubbins` |
if i didn't wish to discuss it, i wouldn't. this is great. |
18:29 |
nubbins` |
you assume that people don't wish to discuss nonsense |
18:30 |
nubbins` |
the length of this exchange implies otherwise |
18:30 |
mircea_popescu |
lol no, you can't "Discuss" nonsense. to discuss a topic you have to renounce nonsense. |
18:30 |
mircea_popescu |
if you wish to wallow in nonsense you're stuck doing it by yourself |
18:30 |
mircea_popescu |
whether you get some others to do the same in your general proximity is irrelevant, everyone's still doing it by himself. |
18:30 |
mircea_popescu |
bukkake like |
18:30 |
nubbins` |
nonsense. you've been talking nonsense with me for like two hours. |
18:31 |
mircea_popescu |
wait till i publish it :) |
18:31 |
nubbins` |
wait til i draw it ;) |
18:31 |
mircea_popescu |
cool, go for it! |
18:31 |
mircea_popescu |
ima add it to the article |
18:32 |
nubbins` |
great, gimme an hour |
18:32 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [VTX] 1 @ 0.38989799 BTC [-] |
18:35 |
mircea_popescu |
here you go. |
18:42 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [HIM] 9 @ 0.059 = 0.531 BTC [-] |
18:42 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 16 @ 0.007265 = 0.1162 BTC [-] |
18:45 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 24 @ 0.00726401 = 0.1743 BTC [-] |
18:50 |
pankkake |
is this art? http://i.imgur.com/lBx4YGG.png |
| |
↖ |
18:52 |
mircea_popescu |
gotta ask putin. |
18:54 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 44 @ 0.00725763 = 0.3193 BTC [-] {2} |
19:00 |
nubbins` |
http://i.imgur.com/UXMRkTT.png |
19:00 |
nubbins` |
that's the best representation of our conversation that i could come up with |
19:01 |
mircea_popescu |
just in time! |
19:02 |
nubbins` |
phew! |
19:03 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 2 @ 0.15 = 0.3 BTC [-] |
19:04 |
nubbins` |
signed, numbered prints available; bare walls are for boors ;) |
19:04 |
mircea_popescu |
http://trilema.com/2013/you-want-to-see-reactionary-ill-show-you-reactionary/ |
19:04 |
ozbot |
You want to see reactionary ? I’ll show you reactionary. pe Trilema - Un blog de Mircea Popescu. |
19:04 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [NEOBEE] 116 @ 0.00277899 = 0.3224 BTC [-] |
19:06 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 10 @ 0.79699306 = 7.9699 BTC [+] {3} |
19:08 |
nubbins` |
made it a couple of paragraphs in before realizing that i already knew how the conversation would go |
19:10 |
mircea_popescu |
jhahaha |
19:10 |
mircea_popescu |
now you know how i feel. |
19:11 |
nubbins` |
to a point, perhaps ;) |
19:11 |
nubbins` |
now you know why i leave the drawing to others |
19:11 |
mircea_popescu |
actually i think it wasn't bad. |
19:12 |
mircea_popescu |
think about it : the first of your productions to be art, |
19:12 |
mircea_popescu |
as enacted by trilema. |
19:12 |
nubbins` |
unfortunately, not the first |
19:12 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 143 @ 0.00081717 = 0.1169 BTC [+] |
19:13 |
nubbins` |
although certainly the first time it's been featured in someone else's blog |
| |
~ 16 minutes ~ |
19:30 |
pankkake |
wow pretty good drawing. i think I would have trouble with the teeth |
19:30 |
pankkake |
you must be a real artist |
19:31 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.79 BTC [-] |
19:33 |
nubbins` |
not sure, you'd have to ask mp |
19:34 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 1000 @ 0.001091 = 1.091 BTC [-] |
19:35 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 1125 @ 0.001091 = 1.2274 BTC [-] |
19:36 |
nubbins` |
anyway, it doesn't even really matter what the specifics look like. it's all about layout on the page |
19:36 |
nubbins` |
how it reads |
19:37 |
nubbins` |
that's the first thing people see |
19:45 |
bitcoin349 |
If the rat is on their computer from when I sent it without hiding my ip then I uninstall it before wiretransfering funds through bitcoin on a virtual machine with different settings and hiding ip on 3 layers would I be traced or would their not be a log in the ISP of the info about the rat. |
19:46 |
dub |
naturally |
19:47 |
Kleeck_ |
How is your VM getting out to the internet, bitcoin349? |
19:47 |
dub |
how dare you ask such personal questions |
19:47 |
Kleeck_ |
"_( |
19:48 |
dub |
rats are very private animals |
19:48 |
dub |
respect that privacy |
19:49 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4500 @ 0.00082024 = 3.6911 BTC [+] |
19:49 |
Kleeck_ |
"Rats. I hate rats." |
19:50 |
mircea_popescu |
;;google 7 proxies |
19:50 |
gribble |
Good Luck, I'm Behind 7 Proxies | Know Your Meme: <http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/good-luck-im-behind-7-proxies>; 7 Proxies - Encyclopedia Dramatica: <https://encyclopediadramatica.es/7_Proxies>; [ubuntu] 7 Proxies? - Ubuntu Forums: <http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1679056> |
19:50 |
mircea_popescu |
3 is wholly insufficient. |
20:04 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [CBTC] 900 @ 0.000243 = 0.2187 BTC [+] |
20:08 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 12250 @ 0.00082258 = 10.0766 BTC [+] {2} |
| |
~ 16 minutes ~ |
20:25 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 100 @ 0.0073031 = 0.7303 BTC [+] |
| |
~ 17 minutes ~ |
20:42 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 20 @ 0.0075 = 0.15 BTC [+] |
20:43 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 6 @ 0.79733002 = 4.784 BTC [+] {4} |
20:44 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4565 @ 0.00082655 = 3.7732 BTC [+] |
20:47 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [CBTC] 520 @ 0.00024449 = 0.1271 BTC [+] |
20:48 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [CBTC] 2380 @ 0.0002445 = 0.5819 BTC [+] |
20:56 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 31 @ 0.0075499 = 0.234 BTC [+] |
21:07 |
benkay |
this art discussion, yo |
21:07 |
benkay |
ain't nothing to it, really |
21:07 |
benkay |
the only opinions as what matter terribly are those as what emanate from the powerful |
21:08 |
benkay |
which is baseline true |
21:08 |
benkay |
it's like the f=ma of power dynamics |
21:08 |
mircea_popescu |
i been tryin to tell him |
21:09 |
benkay |
i did find the line about equivalency between aesthetic value and caloric value amusing |
21:11 |
benkay |
and i only deploy capital against aesthetic things when it's going to have some sort of caloric return. eg: "babe, take this small pile of capital and deploy it making this space look nice. that way when clients come by they won't be horrified by my abysmal decoration and might actually be impressed by my aesthetic committee's performance" |
21:11 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 1 @ 0.1251 BTC [-] |
21:13 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [NEOBEE] 40 @ 0.00277899 = 0.1112 BTC [-] |
21:21 |
nubbins` |
so you pay someone to buy art to put in your home or office or w/e in order to not appear like the sort of person who would be perfectly content inside a grey cube |
21:21 |
nubbins` |
in that context, yes, i suppose you'd only have the opinion of the "powerful" on which to rely |
21:23 |
mircea_popescu |
burn the heretical unbeliever! |
21:23 |
nubbins` |
some of us demand more from our surroundings! |
21:24 |
mircea_popescu |
like better masking for the impact of power. |
21:26 |
nubbins` |
"man, this benkay guy must employ someone who has really good taste in art" |
21:27 |
benkay |
nubs, why u mad, brizzo? |
21:27 |
nubbins` |
i thought we were all mad here |
21:27 |
benkay |
there's some irony in there. |
21:27 |
nubbins` |
best cure for anemia |
21:29 |
benkay |
i exercise veto all the time, man. neural nets need feedback to work correctly. |
21:30 |
benkay |
can't be arsed to go shopping though |
21:30 |
benkay |
very definitely a delegable task. |
21:31 |
benkay |
on an entirely different topic, i fly to argentina tomorrow. i'd be glad to act as a proxy in buenos aires for, you know, not *anyone*, but people in this channel with btc-related inquiries |
21:36 |
nubbins` |
honestly, the concept of going shopping for art hadn't occurred to me until now |
21:37 |
nubbins` |
you do it like you'd shop for pants or a new shower curtain or whatever? |
21:43 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 20 @ 0.81424999 = 16.285 BTC [+] {4} |
21:47 |
benkay |
nubbins`: when a thing strikes me as being of high quality, i generally submit it to the aesthetics comittee for discussion and then instruct said aesthetes to purchase the thing |
21:47 |
benkay |
unless they have cogent reasons for to not, obviously. |
21:49 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [HIM] 10 @ 0.05410003 = 0.541 BTC [-] |
21:49 |
benkay |
(high quality and, you know, appeals to my taste etc) |
21:50 |
benkay |
but occasionally i find myself confronted by a wall insufficiently arted |
21:50 |
nubbins` |
http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=03-11-2013#367374 |
21:50 |
ozbot |
#bitcoin-assets log |
21:55 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 6 @ 0.84799165 = 5.0879 BTC [+] {2} |
21:56 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 5 @ 0.848 = 4.24 BTC [+] |
21:59 |
thestrin1puller |
nubbins` lol |
21:59 |
thestrin1puller |
you cray cray |
21:59 |
benkay |
cray like fox. |
21:59 |
thestrin1puller |
cray like kendrick lamar yo yo |
22:01 |
thestringpuller |
gold for BTC, perfect way to launder |
22:02 |
nubbins` |
^ |
22:05 |
thestringpuller |
gpg yo |
22:05 |
nubbins` |
pdftk is a great program |
22:06 |
thestringpuller |
dat svg |
22:06 |
thestringpuller |
sexy sexy |
22:09 |
benkay |
the bounce is back |
| |
~ 15 minutes ~ |
22:25 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [HIM] 10 @ 0.05989999 = 0.599 BTC [+] |
22:35 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [CBTC] 5000 @ 0.00024449 = 1.2225 BTC [-] |
22:37 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 500 @ 0.00109498 = 0.5475 BTC [+] |
22:39 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.859 BTC [+] |
22:40 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.86 BTC [+] |
22:41 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [NEOBEE] 112 @ 0.00277899 = 0.3112 BTC [-] |
22:42 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 94 @ 0.0075985 = 0.7143 BTC [-] |
22:43 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.87 BTC [+] |
22:49 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 10 @ 0.86 = 8.6 BTC [-] |
22:51 |
benkay |
"commodity backed cryptocurrency" |
22:51 |
benkay |
given that i can take my buttcorns down to ye local banker and turn them into commodities, this is idiocy on idiocy, right? |
22:52 |
mircea_popescu |
so far. |
22:53 |
benkay |
"so far"? |
22:53 |
benkay |
meaning in the absence of a functional commodity-backed cc? |
22:53 |
mircea_popescu |
what you've said so far |
22:53 |
mircea_popescu |
mebbe there's more to it ? |
22:54 |
benkay |
not by my parsing. |
22:54 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.73100011 BTC [-] |
22:54 |
benkay |
just thinking about the concept shows it riddled with the holes of weak minds |
22:55 |
benkay |
how does one trust the issuer of such cc to back it fully and not descend into fractional reserve behavior? |
22:55 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [HIM] 2 @ 0.0599 = 0.1198 BTC [+] |
22:56 |
benkay |
i'm still trying to formulate an argument against people who hold that bitcoin is fiat currency |
22:56 |
benkay |
'cause "it's backed by math, idiot" isn't working |
22:56 |
dub |
erryday I hear, 'no really what are you really cracking' |
22:56 |
benkay |
i find myself trying to convince people of stuff again dammit :( |
22:58 |
benkay |
dub: as in "are you on crack"? |
22:58 |
mircea_popescu |
da fuck is "bitcoin is fiat currency" supposed to mean ? |
22:59 |
benkay |
i think the implication is that it's a currency by consensus |
22:59 |
mike_c |
it doesn't mean anything. What they mean when they say it is that it isn't backed by anything of value. you know, like gold. |
22:59 |
benkay |
which is moronic given that all currencies are only such by consensus |
23:00 |
opc0d3 |
ofmogmozgml0lgz |
23:00 |
benkay |
enlighten me opc0d3 |
23:00 |
mike_c |
it's one of those arguments that when you hear it, your ears start to bleed a little. |
23:00 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4796 @ 0.00084784 = 4.0662 BTC [+] |
23:00 |
opc0d3 |
ICBIT.se 0% fees. mpex is going down the drain. ICBIT.se 2 years of rock solid trusted service. ICBIT.se futures much better then MPEX garbage with 40BTC signup fee |
23:00 |
opc0d3 |
MPEX going to zero. how do i short MPEX. +1 ICBIT.se |
23:00 |
opc0d3 |
that is all. |
23:01 |
opc0d3 |
I doubled my BTC buying futures at ICBIT.se, the greatest and largest futures exchange of all time |
23:01 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [NEOBEE] 49 @ 0.002779 = 0.1362 BTC [+] |
23:01 |
nubbins` |
art by consensus |
23:01 |
benkay |
opc0d3: what's the options volume on icbit? |
23:01 |
opc0d3 |
4:1 leverage. best way to make money with exchange rate going up |
23:01 |
mike_c |
went from 1 btc to 2? congrats! |
23:02 |
benkay |
nubbins`: art because your lord said so. money by the same. |
23:02 |
opc0d3 |
benkay: 170,000 volume on the futures contracts |
23:03 |
nubbins` |
benkay: i'm not the one with an aesthetics subcommittee. |
23:04 |
benkay |
it's not a subcommittee, it only reports to me. |
23:04 |
mircea_popescu |
opc0d3 http://trilema.com/2012/icbitse-the-bucket-shop/ |
23:04 |
mircea_popescu |
start there. |
23:05 |
nubbins` |
consider the statement suitably modified |
23:06 |
nubbins` |
art by fiat! |
23:06 |
mircea_popescu |
i suppose the entire "bitcoin is fiat" argument fails to comprehend that the only true scarcity is mathematical in nature. |
23:06 |
mircea_popescu |
you can't get another number four. |
23:06 |
nubbins` |
art by math: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=03-11-2013#367467 |
23:08 |
benkay |
i would put the a.c. outside for the night if that hit my radar unsolicited. |
23:08 |
asciilifeform |
what's next? some joker will say that an AK round is 'fiat' currency? |
23:08 |
benkay |
(^^ nubbins`) |
23:08 |
asciilifeform |
'barrel doesn't /have/ to be 7.62mm! fiat!' |
23:08 |
nubbins` |
;) |
23:08 |
opc0d3 |
mircea_popescu: so you claim that they sell fake contracts down to force people into margin calls?? doubt it. i've been trading there for 4 months, in the black significantly, (im on this list https://icbit.se/WebTrade/top.aspx ) and have made multiple withdrawls. |
23:08 |
opc0d3 |
Tycho is an ADMIN at bitcointalk and very trusted and is one of the owners. |
23:08 |
benkay |
admin at bitcointalk |
23:08 |
benkay |
well then give him all your isk |
23:08 |
mike_c |
no, an ADMIN |
23:09 |
nubbins` |
admin AT BITCOINTALK |
23:09 |
opc0d3 |
mircea_popescu: sounds like you're just bitter that they had thin volume and someone traded against you |
23:09 |
benkay |
amazing options |
23:09 |
assbot |
AMAZING COMPANY! |
23:09 |
opc0d3 |
point is, he's trusted |
23:09 |
mircea_popescu |
opc0d3 don't be an idiot. that article is older than your involvement in "finance". |
23:09 |
opc0d3 |
laugh all you want. its like laughing at using John K for escrow.. you sound like idiots |
23:09 |
pankkake |
> trusting a website with urls in .aspx |
23:09 |
nubbins` |
trust by fiat |
23:09 |
mircea_popescu |
sigh. |
23:10 |
opc0d3 |
mircea_popescu: they have more volume now. you obviously bought futures in a thin market, and it moved against you. |
23:10 |
mircea_popescu |
i love it when 4 month old muppets imagine their short lifespan compensates for 2year+ history. |
23:10 |
mike_c |
is he kidding? or did john k show his face again? |
23:10 |
nubbins` |
pankkake: there's nothing stopping that from being a renamed .jspx ;) |
23:10 |
mircea_popescu |
opc0d3 mpex had months over 1mn btc nominal. |
23:10 |
opc0d3 |
they're only getting bigger and bigger... so laugh all you want |
23:10 |
mircea_popescu |
the difference is that mpex uses actual figures, rather than running this thinly veiled scam you do. |
23:11 |
opc0d3 |
ICBIT.se is the most legitimate futures exchange right now, and the largest.... so laugh at their success |
23:11 |
mircea_popescu |
they get bigger and bigger each year. |
23:11 |
opc0d3 |
0% fees also |
23:11 |
mircea_popescu |
then they magically don't have the dough to pay the winners, and go into a cone of darkness for a half year |
23:11 |
mircea_popescu |
then they hire some five cent an hour muppets and are again alll sucess and bigger and bigger. |
23:11 |
mircea_popescu |
and again and again. |
23:12 |
mircea_popescu |
unregulated markets have various advantages, among which the existence of such idiocy. |
23:12 |
opc0d3 |
mircea_popescu: it's in your interest to slander you competitors. so, forgive me if I call you on your FUD and BS |
23:12 |
mircea_popescu |
dude. |
23:12 |
benkay |
"don't have the dough to pay the winners" |
23:12 |
benkay |
sauce? |
23:12 |
mircea_popescu |
benkay the article quoted, and there's periodic such reports on bitcointalk |
23:12 |
mircea_popescu |
last one was about 3 months or so. magically, his position was executed 10% under market. |
23:14 |
Apocalyptic |
opc0d3, ICBIT.se ? never heard of that |
23:14 |
mircea_popescu |
and to clarify, opc0d3 , you don't get to come in after a coupla years and call established fact "fud" and "bs". |
23:14 |
mircea_popescu |
if nothing else, because there's little doubt and even less uncertainity involved. |
23:15 |
opc0d3 |
Apocalyptic: its the largest Futures exchange, and they have 0% trading fees right now... its awesome |
23:15 |
benkay |
;;getrating opc0d3 |
23:15 |
gribble |
Use the gettrust command instead. See http://wiki.bitcoin-otc.com/wiki/OTC_Rating_System#Relying_on_the_rating |
23:15 |
benkay |
;;gettrust opc0d3 |
23:15 |
gribble |
WARNING: Currently not authenticated. Trust relationship from user benkay to user opc0d3: Level 1: 0, Level 2: 0 via 0 connections. Graph: http://b-otc.com/stg?source=benkay&dest=opc0d3 | WoT data: http://b-otc.com/vrd?nick=opc0d3 | Rated since: never |
23:15 |
benkay |
ah well there ya go |
23:15 |
opc0d3 |
MPEX is upset that they've stolen market share so they tried to slander them |
23:16 |
benkay |
come back with a wot identity opc0d3 |
23:16 |
opc0d3 |
too lazy |
23:16 |
opc0d3 |
maybe later |
23:16 |
benkay |
a telling response. |
23:17 |
mircea_popescu |
benkay you're just angry because he's stealing your wot share. |
23:17 |
Apocalyptic |
well the fact site is running on ASP makes me chuckle a bit |
23:17 |
opc0d3 |
mircea_popescu: even though i think you're full of shit.... your picture on that horse is hilarious. +1 |
23:17 |
mircea_popescu |
opc0d3 you don't have what to think i'm full of shit with. |
23:18 |
nubbins` |
hey, asp *dot net*! |
23:18 |
pankkake |
oh a webchat user, the advance sign of retardation |
23:18 |
nubbins` |
there's an "x" in those extensions! |
23:18 |
opc0d3 |
Apocalyptic: yeah, funny that most of the worlds corporate software runs on .NET , i wonder why multi-billion dollar companies use .NET... what idiots@!! |
23:18 |
pankkake |
lol |
23:18 |
Apocalyptic |
do they ? i feel more secure running a linux server honestly |
23:18 |
Apocalyptic |
but what do I know... |
23:18 |
nubbins` |
they do. |
23:19 |
opc0d3 |
only idiots would buy windows. That Mircosoft company must be worthless.... let me check |
23:19 |
pankkake |
you know, multi billion dollar companies aren't a very good example of competence or efficiency |
23:19 |
Apocalyptic |
^^ |
23:19 |
opc0d3 |
$300B market cap! |
23:19 |
benkay |
inertia, mostly. |
23:19 |
benkay |
and what's the fb market cap? and their competence/business acumen? |
23:19 |
opc0d3 |
pankkake: doesn't mean that running a .NET site is stupid or bad idea. |
23:19 |
pankkake |
you'll figure it out when you get out of school |
23:20 |
opc0d3 |
i run linux on all my servers. but can tell you from experience that big corps prefer MSFT |
23:20 |
pankkake |
so? |
23:20 |
Apocalyptic |
opc0d3, they "prefer" that's it |
23:20 |
mircea_popescu |
this is progressing nicely. |
23:20 |
Apocalyptic |
doesn't mean anything about the value of the product |
23:21 |
opc0d3 |
you guys are lemmings to laugh at .NET |
23:21 |
opc0d3 |
linux fanboys |
23:21 |
mircea_popescu |
opc0d3 where have you learned to win friends and influence people ? |
23:21 |
mircea_popescu |
it wasn't steve ballmer was it. |
23:21 |
nubbins` |
see, the thing is: coca-cola can afford to pay for gold-tier support contracts, so they can use .NET and if it breaks (which it doesn't), they have a big red telephone they can pick up to get it fixed |
23:21 |
opc0d3 |
i personally don't use any MSFT products, but would never be so idiotic to laugh at developers that do |
23:21 |
nubbins` |
some random btc-related website likely doesn't have any sort of gold-tier anything |
23:22 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 99 @ 0.0075988 = 0.7523 BTC [+] |
23:22 |
nubbins` |
and so if something breaks (it will), they're fucked until they figure out how to fix it |
23:22 |
opc0d3 |
+1 nubbins |
23:22 |
nubbins` |
THAT SAID |
23:22 |
mircea_popescu |
nubbins` except a fictitious exchange with no volume could be just as well run off dreamweaver. |
23:22 |
opc0d3 |
nah. .NET deployments are usually much more stable then linux ones |
23:22 |
nubbins` |
the support community around .NET is just as massive as the one around any other web dev technology |
23:23 |
nubbins` |
mircea_popescu: notepad, even |
23:23 |
mircea_popescu |
was. |
23:23 |
Apocalyptic |
opc0d3, out of curiosity when was this trading plateform launched ? |
23:23 |
mircea_popescu |
it was, in 2001. maybe 2005. |
23:23 |
mircea_popescu |
it's nowhere near today. |
23:23 |
opc0d3 |
what a load of BS>... ICBIT is not 'fictitious' nor does it have no volume.... so much misinformation and lies in here |
23:23 |
opc0d3 |
you're just pissed you have competition -- successful competition |
23:23 |
nubbins` |
ah, i haven't worked with .NET since around 2005-07 |
23:23 |
dub |
tycho is that guy that forgot how to run a pool yeah? |
23:23 |
benkay |
opc0d3 - it's an echo chamber in here. don't get butthurt. |
23:23 |
mircea_popescu |
opc0d3 dude, every mayfly in the book has said the exact same thing about me. |
23:23 |
mircea_popescu |
read moar. |
23:23 |
nubbins` |
left it behind when WCF started getting pushed |
23:24 |
mircea_popescu |
nubbins` from what i hear you weren't alone |
23:25 |
opc0d3 |
benkay: MP talks, and pankkake echo's , seems like |
23:25 |
nubbins` |
the years of sharepoint development sucked my soul out, but being forced to move to WCF was the straw that broke me |
23:25 |
opc0d3 |
a cute little parrot on his shoulder |
23:25 |
pankkake |
what you don't understand is that there is only one person here |
23:25 |
nubbins` |
^ |
23:25 |
mircea_popescu |
opc0d3 you know you could save yourself a lot of embarassment by reviewing the logs for a few days before blindly jumping in. |
23:25 |
nubbins` |
everyone else is a robot |
23:26 |
mircea_popescu |
an approach which actually would make your life better in every aspect. |
23:26 |
mike_c |
then you would know how to identify art. |
23:26 |
benkay |
what ams art? |
23:26 |
benkay |
r options art? |
23:26 |
pankkake |
please not again :( |
23:26 |
mircea_popescu |
mike_c by the way, you do have a point. |
23:26 |
benkay |
i am making put arts |
23:26 |
nubbins` |
it's art if i publish it |
23:26 |
nubbins` |
should we get eskimo bob in here? |
23:26 |
mircea_popescu |
while the opex system works great in every aspect as it is, the underwriter has no actual way to verify when they were executed in fact. |
23:27 |
mircea_popescu |
so for all they know i could be making shit up. |
23:27 |
mike_c |
yes :) |
23:27 |
asciilifeform |
opc0d3: there are no people here. just a script, running on a PDP-8 drywalled into a closet, door painted over, at NSA campus. |
23:27 |
mircea_popescu |
it somehow never occured to me, this. |
23:27 |
mircea_popescu |
i'm lucky i'm not the only person reading these logs, it turns out. anyway, we're in the process of arguing about it. |
23:27 |
mike_c |
ah, glad to hear. |
23:27 |
benkay |
i think i have wondered at this myself |
23:28 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 40 @ 0.0076 = 0.304 BTC [+] |
23:28 |
benkay |
("me too! me too!") |
23:29 |
mike_c |
i will share all the prize money with you benkay |
23:30 |
benkay |
mircea_popescu: what do you think about ludwig von mises? |
23:30 |
mircea_popescu |
as what, a main course meal ? |
23:31 |
benkay |
you eat men |
23:31 |
benkay |
dear dog save us all |
23:31 |
mircea_popescu |
lmao. |
23:31 |
nubbins` |
there is no dog |
23:31 |
mircea_popescu |
no but seriously, much more of an economist than a philosopher, for instance. |
23:31 |
nubbins` |
there is only natas! |
23:32 |
benkay |
nah i have two weeks of reading and boozing and wenching coming up and i want something meaty |
23:32 |
benkay |
something that'll stick to my brainbones |
23:32 |
benkay |
i've lined up the modern money theory stuff on the premise that coming through that'll inoculate me against some brands of idiocy |
23:33 |
mircea_popescu |
dubious proposition. |
23:33 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 100 @ 0.00759988 = 0.76 BTC [-] {2} |
23:33 |
nubbins` |
best stick to fiction |
23:33 |
mircea_popescu |
seeing how its entire appeal is constructed by ceaseless repeating |
23:33 |
benkay |
okay noted |
23:33 |
mircea_popescu |
the sad thing of money is that nobody really wrote of it well. |
23:34 |
mircea_popescu |
it's like this supermistress of most accomplished lures which goes wholly forgotten and ignored to the grave, |
23:34 |
mircea_popescu |
because the sort of men she loved and loved her back were too busy doing to harp about it. |
23:34 |
benkay |
(doing it) |
23:35 |
mircea_popescu |
:p |
23:35 |
benkay |
i suspect i alreaady understand mises work just from the subtitle of that one book |
23:36 |
benkay |
how the middle way leads to socialism, bad policies following bad policies etc |
23:36 |
mircea_popescu |
instead phthisic "women" captive in the bodies of little boys like all the various utopian facets of socialism get tons of idyllic literature fashioned |
23:36 |
mircea_popescu |
by the sort of idle, pointless virgins that'd be interested in such crap. |
23:37 |
benkay |
plato, then? |
23:37 |
mircea_popescu |
btw pankkake you're doing a very small amount of parroting over here! i thought we had a deal! |
23:37 |
pankkake |
I need to insult you more |
23:37 |
pankkake |
or something |
23:38 |
mircea_popescu |
the one problem with these kids is... they have no endurance. |
23:38 |
pankkake |
I haven't read your latest blog stuff so I have nothing to disagree with |
23:38 |
mircea_popescu |
ten minutes later they're gone. how's one supposed to have fun ;/ |
23:39 |
mircea_popescu |
hey opc0d3 come back! we weren't done!@ |
23:40 |
pankkake |
well he probably came earlier and will come back later. I wonder why he picked me, I wasn't even parroting this time |
23:40 |
nubbins` |
once the conversation turned to books, i began silently lamenting my inability to finish reading one hundred years of solitude |
23:40 |
pankkake |
though it felt that way other times |
23:40 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [VTX] 1 @ 0.389 BTC [-] |
23:40 |
pankkake |
I don't understand futures, options, and have no idea what icbit is :) |
23:41 |
nubbins` |
voodoo gibberish, stay away |
23:41 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 25 @ 0.0076999 = 0.1925 BTC [+] |
23:41 |
benkay |
black finance magic of the destroy economies kind |
23:41 |
benkay |
only allowed on buttcoin black markets |
23:42 |
mircea_popescu |
it's basically bitcoinica minus the relic hunting. |
23:42 |
pankkake |
"savage capitalism" as your socialists say |
23:42 |
mircea_popescu |
i don't recall now if it was written as a bitcoinica envy clone or not. |
23:42 |
benkay |
hey mircea_popescu what were you implying the other day when you queried for the s.mg price and then made a comment about an in-game thing? |
23:42 |
pankkake |
somehow when I see savage I think of a horse running free in the grass |
23:43 |
pankkake |
so I'm ok with that |
23:43 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 121 @ 0.00109498 = 0.1325 BTC [+] {2} |
23:43 |
mircea_popescu |
benkay just idle comment that the volume was apparently up |
23:43 |
mircea_popescu |
or down |
23:43 |
mircea_popescu |
or i don't recall which |
23:44 |
benkay |
i'd started imagining game/stock tie-ins |
23:48 |
benkay |
hey mircea_popescu you have some education to perform: https://twitter.com/rabois/status/397075060499812352 |
23:49 |
mircea_popescu |
what's the rush. |
23:49 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 193 @ 0.00769996 = 1.4861 BTC [+] {2} |
23:49 |
mike_c |
joel spolsky |
23:53 |
pankkake |
it's part of his strategy though |
23:53 |
pankkake |
not posting stupid shit on twitter |
23:53 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [HIM] 4 @ 0.05989999 = 0.2396 BTC [-] |
23:53 |
mircea_popescu |
actually i think there's a rss to twitter feed. |
23:54 |
dub |
speaking of education |
23:54 |
dub |
http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/bella/2013/01/your_chinese_takeout_box_has_b.php |
23:54 |
dub |
groundbreaking stuff |
23:55 |
mircea_popescu |
mike_c probably not count because engineers aren't "successfull ceos". |
23:55 |
mircea_popescu |
or because july isn't current. or w/e. |
23:56 |
benkay |
dub: i wanted it to have a badbios |
23:59 |
nubbins` |
your chinese takeout box has had a badbios this whole time |
23:59 |
dub |
tl;dr? seen it mentioned a few times today |