| 17:40 |
shinohai |
test |
| |
↖ |
| 17:41 |
asciilifeform |
shinohai: ack |
| 17:42 |
shinohai |
Weird, my messages go out but didn't see asciilifeform 's reply http://logs.bitdash.io/pest/2022-03-04#1004096 |
| 17:42 |
bitbot |
Logged on 2022-03-04 17:40:53 shinohai[asciilifeform|billymg]: test |
| 17:42 |
asciilifeform |
hm nao seeing shinohai as hearsay |
| 17:42 |
shinohai |
I see jonsykkel and PeterL tho |
| 17:44 |
PeterL |
which version are you running? |
| 17:44 |
* |
asciilifeform latest |
| 17:45 |
* |
shinohai also sees signpost .... |
| 17:50 |
shinohai |
now seeing asciilifeform .... fergot about the "5 min delay" |
| 17:50 |
shinohai |
derp |
| |
~ 40 minutes ~ |
| 18:31 |
billymg |
awt: good news in cr "Also, on April 1, the country will eliminate the use of the QR code to verify vaccination." |
| 18:31 |
billymg |
although the date is sus |
| 18:32 |
* |
billymg still has yet to receive a PCR test or any other memeflu test |
| |
~ 1 hours 47 minutes ~ |
| 20:20 |
awt |
billymg: now if only the us would eliminate it for re-entry |
| 20:20 |
awt |
Bought tix to San Salvador |
| 20:21 |
awt |
Also, wrt 3rd party stations, I propose adding a /track <handle> command to have handles from 3rd party stations show up in your nicklist. /untrack to remove. |
| |
↖ |
| 20:23 |
billymg |
awt: nice, looking forward to reports from the ground |
| 20:37 |
awt |
I currently don't see anyone I have added to my wot as hearsay, so I will need help from the affected parties to debug |
| |
↖ |
| 20:39 |
awt |
There are many things that could be going wrong, including bad key, timing, etc. |
| 20:40 |
awt |
Could eliminiate bad key by sending a dm |
| 20:50 |
awt |
Could eliminate timing by starting a config with only the affected peer. |
| |
↖ |
| |
~ 1 hours 22 minutes ~ |
| 22:12 |
awt |
Testing 9979-presence.vpatch |
| 22:13 |
awt |
jonsykkel appears to be offline fwiw |
| 22:16 |
jonsykkel |
im here |
| 22:17 |
awt |
jonsykkel: last rubbish message I had from you before your message just now was 2022-03-04 14:16:03.623170 |
| 22:17 |
jonsykkel |
rubbish message meaning ignore packet? |
| 22:17 |
awt |
yes |
| 22:18 |
awt |
jonsykkel: possibly was not ignore packet, but just a broadcast |
| 22:18 |
jonsykkel |
using my pestron, shud be broadcasting ignores every sec |
| 22:18 |
jonsykkel |
could be, havent spoked in a while |
| 22:19 |
awt |
jonsykkel: yeah for some reason I'm either not getting ignore packets from you or not updatting the at when I get them |
| 22:22 |
jonsykkel |
have disabled logging for those packets but according to fw packet counter i have stuff going out udp constantly |
| 22:22 |
awt |
jonsykkel: lol yes I also have disabled logging. lemme restart with logging enabled |
| 22:22 |
jonsykkel |
hehe |
| 22:25 |
awt |
damn looks like blatta only logs outgoing ignore packets |
| 22:27 |
jonsykkel |
somethig i wander about actually, calculating warmness of peer properly requires u to dedup ignore packets (or else replayed ignores will warm up peer that should be cold) |
| 22:28 |
jonsykkel |
unless im mising something |
| 22:40 |
awt |
jonsykkel I'm getting stale packet errors from your address |
| 22:42 |
jonsykkel |
awt: my ignore packets are full of rngolade, including timestamp field |
| 22:42 |
jonsykkel |
maybe this is wrong per spec |
| 22:45 |
awt |
http://www.loper-os.org/pub/pest/pest_draft.html#3113-payload |
| 22:45 |
jonsykkel |
inded, 0xFC "it will consist of arabitrary random bytes", 0xFB "the Payload will consist of arbitrary random bytes" |
| 22:46 |
awt |
ahah |
| 22:47 |
jonsykkel |
wil repair for upcuming release, if ignores must be deduped they must also have stamp field, so this makes sens |
| |
~ 17 minutes ~ |
| 23:05 |
awt |
9979 available here for any who wish to try: http://share.alethepedia.com/blatta/ |
| |
~ 48 minutes ~ |
| 23:53 |
shinohai |
Ah jonsykkel, you are connect using smalpest now? |
| 23:53 |
shinohai |
tyvm awt |
| 23:53 |
jonsykkel |
jep shinohai |
| 23:54 |
shinohai |
\o/ |
| 23:55 |
jonsykkel |
i maked a mistake in udp code in teh prev released versions, gona put fixed very soon. shud be entirely usabl on testnet then |
| 23:55 |
jonsykkel |
prolly why it dident work when we tested also |