11:29 |
shinohai |
Bitnodes only shows 4 trb nodes nau O.o https://bitnodes.earn.com/nodes/?q=/therealbitcoin.org:0.9.99.99 |
11:30 |
shinohai |
(coin.dance still shows 6) |
11:30 |
asciilifeform |
shinohai: they seem to display ~random subset of the known (i.e. people who specifically diddled the ver string to show up there) boxes |
11:31 |
shinohai |
Last time I checked, saw all of the pizarro nodes |
| |
~ 6 hours 34 minutes ~ |
18:05 |
lobbes |
asciilifeform: I have a question re: the unix epoch timestamps in the phf logs. So, when I look through them, I see two numbers essentially, e.g. "1440678;1459171457;" |
18:05 |
lobbes |
Now, the second number is obv the epoch timestamp. My best guess on the first number is that it is simply some sort of a line index of sorts. |
18:05 |
lobbes |
So, my question is: do you want the znc-eater.py to produce both numbers as such, or is just the unix epoch time adequate for what you need? |
| |
~ 4 hours 11 minutes ~ |
22:17 |
asciilifeform |
lobbes: see readme.txt in the genesis plox |
22:18 |
asciilifeform |
( you guessed correctly, the smaller # is index. it is not important in the absolute what it is, but ~must~ be monotonic and ~must~ agree with the existing indices ) |
22:22 |
asciilifeform |
!quptime |
22:22 |
snsabot |
asciilifeform: time since my last reconnect : 1d 0h 30m |
| |
~ 1 hours 17 minutes ~ |
23:39 |
lobbes |
ah okay; reading the eat_dump.py in the genesis cleared some things up |
23:39 |
lobbes |
so, the monotonically increasing thing makes sense, but when you say agree with existing indicies, I assume you mean the existing indicies on *one particular implemented logger*, versus say "has to 'match' btcbase's indicies" |
23:39 |
lobbes |
in other words, like a 'knob' someone can set that says "eat these ZNC logs, making an index, but do NOT let index go past 10000" or somesuch? |
23:42 |
asciilifeform |
lobbes: ideally you'd count backwards from my 'bottoms' in the chans that are missing archive atm |
23:42 |
asciilifeform |
see constant 'newchan_idx' |
23:45 |
lobbes |
aha, I literally just thought "oh yeah, I could go backwards, huh?" |
23:45 |
lobbes |
sweet okay. this makes sense. ty |