00:00 |
Duffer1 |
:P |
00:00 |
Duffer1 |
howcome there isn't a MP coin? |
00:01 |
Duffer1 |
pay 20btc to mine it |
00:01 |
Duffer1 |
1btc per addres |
00:01 |
Duffer1 |
s |
00:04 |
Duffer1 |
block reward negotiable |
00:05 |
fiat500 |
LOL |
00:05 |
fiat500 |
now thats innovation |
00:06 |
fiat500 |
market-based block reward |
00:10 |
mircea_popescu |
;lol |
00:18 |
asciilifeform |
better marscoin. |
00:18 |
asciilifeform |
betcha the first orbiting blockchain gizmo will be hooked to an altchain |
00:18 |
asciilifeform |
not for any good reason, but to promote the otherwise forgettable crackpot alt which it would otherwise be |
| |
~ 36 minutes ~ |
00:54 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11700 @ 0.0008817 = 10.3159 BTC [+] {2} |
01:09 |
mircea_popescu |
it's a bet |
01:16 |
theskyisfalling |
its a me |
01:19 |
fiat500 |
http://falkvinge.net/2011/05/29/why-im-putting-all-my-savings-into-bitcoin/ |
01:19 |
fiat500 |
did he end up selling at some point or is he still all in? anyone know? |
01:21 |
fiat500 |
nvm, seems like a moron |
01:25 |
mircea_popescu |
he gets the occasional good point |
01:26 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 8700 @ 0.00088259 = 7.6785 BTC [+] |
01:33 |
Duffer1 |
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-12-20/european-union-loses-aaa-credit-rating-at-s-p-on-weaker-cohesion.html |
01:33 |
ozbot |
European Union Stripped of AAA Credit Rating at S&P - Bloomberg |
01:47 |
mircea_popescu |
no reason it should have had it |
01:47 |
mircea_popescu |
no reason the us should have aa either |
01:47 |
mircea_popescu |
c is what it is. |
01:49 |
Duffer1 |
star citizen needs to be a real thing right now that i can play |
01:58 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 21929 @ 0.00088192 = 19.3396 BTC [-] {3} |
02:03 |
theskyisfalling |
eve wannabe |
02:06 |
Duffer1 |
have you seen the hanger footage on youtube? |
02:07 |
Duffer1 |
hangar even |
02:12 |
fiat500 |
"The downgrade “changes nothing,” President Francois Hollande of France, Europe’s second-largest economy, told reporters today after a summit of European leaders in Brussels." |
02:13 |
fiat500 |
what is the point of having a rating at all? |
02:13 |
Duffer1 |
lower borrower rates |
02:14 |
fiat500 |
i mean given the notion that a downgrade 'changes nothing' - seems like he should be arguing it was undeserved, not that it is meaningless |
02:15 |
Duffer1 |
oh ya politicians say things but all i hear is bbzzzzzzzz |
02:15 |
Duffer1 |
it's weird |
02:16 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11200 @ 0.00087815 = 9.8353 BTC [-] |
02:24 |
benkay |
BingoBoingo: why some insane algol derivative and not a lisp? |
02:26 |
BingoBoingo |
benkay: I'm trying to put myself in a position to appreciate the better things when I have the background to leverage them. |
02:28 |
benkay |
hm |
02:29 |
benkay |
you wouldn't go learn to do things the wrong way just to hear your sensei tell you to pour out two years of practice, would you? |
02:32 |
benkay |
BingoBoingo: i strongly recommend you not fill your cup with those idiocies. there is a strong push towards things that are easy, but taking the easy route now sets you up for a whole shitton of unnecessary unlearning later. |
02:33 |
benkay |
obviously, i don't know anything about anything and my 'advice' on programming matters should be regarded as highly suspect |
02:33 |
BingoBoingo |
Well, anything is better than Java |
02:34 |
benkay |
but i gather that you don't actually need to be scripting python, and the cleaner the break with whatever your past is (Java especially), the easier of a time you're going to have wrapping your head around the functional approach. |
02:36 |
benkay |
once you get into the class-based systems (which Python libraries inevitably drive you to), Python is just Java lacking a few particular flakes of shit. |
02:37 |
BingoBoingo |
Probably. |
02:37 |
fiat500 |
benkay: sounds like a condemnation of OO/imperative programming in general |
02:37 |
benkay |
it has its place |
02:38 |
benkay |
in large corporations where they hire labor. |
02:38 |
fiat500 |
fp is not the most elegant/efficient way to express solutions to every problem |
02:39 |
fiat500 |
i think you are conflating the 'where' with the 'why' |
02:39 |
benkay |
do go on |
02:40 |
fiat500 |
which of my two statements do you find issue with? |
02:41 |
benkay |
neither. i don't quite understand your comment about wheres and whys, tho. |
02:41 |
benkay |
but! |
02:42 |
benkay |
this is a highly contextual conversation between BingoBoingo and myself, albeit in a public domain. |
02:42 |
fiat500 |
hm, sorry, guess i was missing context then |
02:43 |
fiat500 |
my point was that the size of the corporation (or really more generally, where a problem is being solved) does not have a bearing on the type of problem being solved |
02:43 |
fiat500 |
in the context of fp vs imperative |
02:44 |
benkay |
sounds like you're assuming BigCorp can select even an approximately appropriate tool for a job. |
02:44 |
fiat500 |
how do you define bigcorp? |
02:44 |
benkay |
heh |
02:44 |
fiat500 |
are we excluding tech companies from this? |
02:44 |
benkay |
has mgmt that thinks that sw dev teams of greater than 10 members are an acceptable idea. |
02:45 |
benkay |
doesn't understand nonlinear comms overhead. |
02:45 |
BingoBoingo |
Well, generally generic BigCorp wants fungible workers, and they generally use blub as a tool to keep workers fungible. |
02:45 |
fiat500 |
fb fits that description, and fb is really good at using say - haskell - as the right tool for some of their internal analytics |
02:46 |
benkay |
ya and their deploy strategy is also "compile php to c and torrent it around the internal network" |
02:46 |
benkay |
so you tell me if that's a mature dev environment. |
02:47 |
benkay |
there's a whole stack of shit that bothers me about OOP |
02:47 |
benkay |
first, OOP is designed to get people hammering keyboards as quickly as possible, which is orthogonal to teaching humans how computers actually work. |
02:47 |
benkay |
the pathological case being the .NET Mort. |
02:47 |
fiat500 |
i think my point is, while fb is rather large, has sw dev teams > 10 members, and uses OOP for many things, they also use fp where it makes sense |
02:48 |
benkay |
yeah i just can't accept FB as an example of a mature and sustained development environment delivering business value. |
02:48 |
benkay |
of course they have dev teams > 10 |
02:49 |
BingoBoingo |
I don't think .NET and OOP are equivalently problematic. OOP can be useful in cases. Somethings want to be objects. I mean CLOS is a thing. The problem is what happens once you make an object. |
02:49 |
benkay |
ya well, brain surgery lasers are great in the hands of brain surgeons |
02:50 |
benkay |
problem is everyone wants to make tools that make computing 'simpler' 'easier' 'more understandable' |
02:50 |
benkay |
but all of these layers of abstraction get in between problems and people who can fix them. |
02:50 |
fiat500 |
if you think of objects as just structs with function pointers, its hard to argue that an object is an inappropriate way to represent state in a stateful system |
02:50 |
benkay |
mrh |
02:50 |
benkay |
i lean towards the monadic approach these days. |
02:51 |
benkay |
but what about the insane method inheritance? |
02:51 |
benkay |
how do I teach someone what the ever loving fuck is going on in a Django project? |
02:52 |
benkay |
a string has a .split method? give me a break! |
02:52 |
benkay |
do forgive me |
02:52 |
benkay |
i'm fresh out of a code retreat with some humans who really grok oop and yet failed to put together class hierarchies to implement the game of life in 45 minutes. |
02:52 |
fiat500 |
not to defend django or python, but a split method is useful enough that it should probably exist somewhere - where would you put it? |
02:53 |
benkay |
in a library of functions |
02:53 |
benkay |
that operate on a wide variety of data structures |
02:53 |
fiat500 |
ok, i see what you're getting at here |
02:54 |
benkay |
i come at this all from a weird non cs perspective, so i'm sure a lot of the conclusions that i've come to are completely bogus. |
02:54 |
fiat500 |
the problem arises where a newer, more efficient implementation is found at some point, and the internal structure of the string must change (consider it getting generalized to a rope, as an extreme and ridiculous example) |
02:54 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 13593 @ 0.00087945 = 11.9544 BTC [+] {2} |
02:54 |
BingoBoingo |
Eh, At least we aren't debating SQL |
02:55 |
benkay |
in my world, functions take arguments and return values. |
02:55 |
fiat500 |
now this external library of functions must become aware of this change and handle it |
02:55 |
benkay |
hopefully ones fundamental data structures aren't evolving too quickly |
02:55 |
fiat500 |
well, concrete example |
02:55 |
fiat500 |
NSDictionary in the land of cocoa, changes its internal structure based on its contents |
02:56 |
benkay |
oh god |
02:56 |
fiat500 |
it switches to a more optimal data structure when its size gets large enough |
02:57 |
benkay |
this is a pretty common implementation of data structures, right? |
02:57 |
fiat500 |
http://ridiculousfish.com/blog/posts/array.html |
02:57 |
ozbot |
Array |
02:58 |
benkay |
yeah that's great |
02:59 |
fiat500 |
not saying its great, just a choice made by the designers, i think it adds a nice variety to the mix |
02:59 |
benkay |
well to return to the topic of my rant |
02:59 |
benkay |
when someone sits down to hammer out some OOP, they look at the code surrounding what they need to write, and they copy out stuff that looks like what they've seen and it just works. |
02:59 |
BingoBoingo |
You know what language really makes sense. TeX |
03:00 |
benkay |
the OOP dream of the nineties is alive in Py-thon...Py-thon! |
03:00 |
fiat500 |
hahahaha |
03:01 |
benkay |
but to really understand what's happening they need to understand the class that they're subclassing, what the hell subclassing is, how instances of classes get new-ed the fuck up, all this absurd cognitive overhead |
03:01 |
fiat500 |
versus writing everything from scratch? |
03:02 |
fiat500 |
i think the most egregious example of this is c++, not python |
03:02 |
benkay |
nah |
03:02 |
benkay |
vs understanding that functions take input arguments and return values |
03:03 |
fiat500 |
the same values? |
03:03 |
BingoBoingo |
Eh, C++ is what the first programming classes I'd taken were conducted in. |
03:03 |
benkay |
given the same inputs you'd have a tough time convincing me there's a good reason not to... |
03:03 |
fiat500 |
BingoBoingo: i mean in the sense that many people who are using c++ don't really understand wtf is going on behind the scenes |
03:04 |
BingoBoingo |
Before that though I banged away in motorola 68k assembler on the TI-89 and mac |
03:04 |
fiat500 |
benkay: thats a great way to solve some problems, not really great for stateful systems |
03:04 |
BingoBoingo |
fiat500: Why shouldn't you be ale to change the system as it runs? |
03:05 |
benkay |
fiat500: there are exceptions. |
03:05 |
fiat500 |
i dont think i said you shouldnt be able to... im saying you should |
03:05 |
benkay |
fiat500: OOP leads the programmer to encapsulate state in the most insane places possible. |
03:05 |
benkay |
the b |
03:05 |
fiat500 |
benkay: yeah, not gonna dispute this, i see it all the time, and not just with novices |
03:06 |
benkay |
all fp does is urge you at a language level to do something sane with your state. |
03:06 |
benkay |
it's not a panacea |
03:06 |
benkay |
panacea to the BigCorp software dev problem |
03:06 |
benkay |
probably never will be, relationship of comms overhead to number of devs on team being what it is. |
03:06 |
fiat500 |
perhaps instead of bigcorp you mean "unsophisticated" |
03:06 |
fiat500 |
i would agree with that |
03:06 |
benkay |
eh |
03:06 |
benkay |
it's a metaphor |
03:07 |
benkay |
exercise for the reader and all that |
03:07 |
fiat500 |
haha |
03:07 |
benkay |
consider it a shit test for dev ability |
03:07 |
benkay |
"can you fp? okay. you've got 3 months to demonstrate competence." |
03:08 |
fiat500 |
sounds generous |
03:08 |
benkay |
it's typically obvious after 2 weeks when they can't. |
03:09 |
benkay |
point being: oop has layers and layers of absurd needless complexity. |
03:10 |
benkay |
there are lisps for every platform these days |
03:10 |
benkay |
but BingoBoingo wouldn't you like your platform to support true parallelized operation eh eh eh? |
03:11 |
BingoBoingo |
benkay: I would. Maybe. |
03:12 |
BingoBoingo |
I'd settle for does what it is told, |
03:14 |
benkay |
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/fuckit |
03:15 |
ozbot |
fuckit 1.0.0 : Python Package Index |
03:15 |
BingoBoingo |
I wouldn't mind a Macintosh SE/30 with less magic smoke than the last one produced. |
03:15 |
benkay |
next computer i get excited about comes from the asciilifeform labs |
03:15 |
BingoBoingo |
Probably the same here |
03:16 |
benkay |
next computer my company actually buys me is a well-designed thing whose default ctags implementation doesn't recurse |
03:16 |
benkay |
good night sir |
03:25 |
fiat500 |
"This module is like violence: if it doesn't work, you just need more of it." |
03:25 |
fiat500 |
beautiful |
03:32 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 2 @ 0.2928 = 0.5856 BTC [-] |
| |
~ 15 minutes ~ |
03:47 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11535 @ 0.00088004 = 10.1513 BTC [+] {2} |
03:49 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [PETA] 20 @ 0.05 = 1 BTC [+] |
04:00 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [NEOBEE] 114 @ 0.002904 = 0.3311 BTC [-] |
| |
~ 39 minutes ~ |
04:39 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 19150 @ 0.00087974 = 16.847 BTC [-] {2} |
04:47 |
BingoBoingo |
How many accounts are posting on behalf of NeoBee nao? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=182236 |
04:52 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 5000 @ 0.00088148 = 4.4074 BTC [+] |
05:01 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4500 @ 0.00088148 = 3.9667 BTC [+] |
05:03 |
Apocalyptic |
.d |
05:03 |
ozbot |
1180923195.25803 | Next Diff in 2009 blocks | Estimated Change: -15.8654% in 16d 3h 52m 29s |
05:11 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 727 @ 0.00088182 = 0.6411 BTC [+] {2} |
05:12 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 20573 @ 0.00088316 = 18.1693 BTC [+] {3} |
05:26 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11775 @ 0.00088324 = 10.4002 BTC [+] |
05:28 |
BingoBoingo |
;;asks 1250 |
05:28 |
gribble |
There are currently 22017.358 bitcoins offered at or under 1250.0 USD, worth 20955828.2806 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0979 seconds |
| |
~ 52 minutes ~ |
06:21 |
jurov |
Please note that while Danny enjoys interacting with the forum and answering questions when he can, he is still the CEO of the company, and thus is quite busy most of the time. |
06:22 |
jurov |
busy indeed.. extracting bitcoins from weexchange |
06:23 |
jurov |
Hello everyone, this account will be used for Neo investor-related updates and communications going forward, rather than the ThickAsThieves one. |
06:23 |
jurov |
ha. |
06:24 |
jurov |
Please whitelist this account for business use. I will follow up with a post from my main account, ThickAsThieves. |
06:24 |
jurov |
so it's TAT |
06:36 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 18806 @ 0.00087778 = 16.5075 BTC [-] {2} |
| |
~ 16 minutes ~ |
06:52 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 20300 @ 0.00087722 = 17.8076 BTC [-] {2} |
06:53 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9700 @ 0.00088324 = 8.5674 BTC [+] |
06:54 |
bevardis1 |
Hey guys. I want to buy some bitcoins. How fast is it possible to do it with a reasonable price (not more than 20% increase, hopefully <10%)? I have paypal, credit card, etc. I'm european. Looking for advice here, not offers :) |
07:04 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4200 @ 0.00088324 = 3.7096 BTC [+] |
07:06 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [NEOBEE] 100 @ 0.002905 = 0.2905 BTC [+] |
07:08 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [SFI] 139 @ 0.001 = 0.139 BTC |
07:22 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 4 @ 0.292775 = 1.1711 BTC [-] {2} |
07:26 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 4 @ 0.29289999 = 1.1716 BTC [+] |
| |
~ 18 minutes ~ |
07:44 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 373 @ 0.0026792 = 0.9993 BTC [-] {2} |
07:46 |
pankkake |
Bernankoin v1.2 released, dual QE scheduled for january, affirmative action later |
07:48 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.28000002 BTC [-] |
07:52 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 5 @ 0.27880201 = 1.394 BTC [-] {3} |
| |
~ 16 minutes ~ |
08:08 |
nubbins` |
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/poltergeist-behaviour-haunts-st-john-s-family-1.2471911 |
08:08 |
ozbot |
Poltergeist behaviour haunts St. John's family - Newfoundland & Labrador - CBC News |
08:09 |
nubbins` |
brutally poor standard of journalism haunts st. john's news team |
08:09 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 10250 @ 0.00087911 = 9.0109 BTC [-] |
| |
~ 19 minutes ~ |
08:28 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [PETA] 3 @ 0.05 = 0.15 BTC [+] |
08:30 |
ThickAsThieves |
This is more of a haunting than a poltergeist behavior which tends to be more violent. My wife and I have had many strange unexplained experiences happen also. I am no so keen on mediums though. There are only a few in the world that are actually any good at being specific or accurate. |
08:30 |
ThickAsThieves |
(commenter) |
08:36 |
ThickAsThieves |
;;bcstats |
08:36 |
gribble |
Current Blocks: 276215 | Current Difficulty: 1.1809231952580261E9 | Next Difficulty At Block: 278207 | Next Difficulty In: 1992 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 1 week, 6 days, 0 hours, 28 minutes, and 14 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 1097402926.23 | Estimated Percent Change: -7.07246 |
08:36 |
ThickAsThieves |
the bet should be closed |
08:36 |
ThickAsThieves |
http://bitbet.us/bet/519/btc-network-difficulty-to-top-1b-before-2014/ |
08:36 |
ozbot |
BitBet - BTC network difficulty to top 1B before 2014 |
08:40 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2200 @ 0.00088177 = 1.9399 BTC [+] |
08:42 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 7129 @ 0.00088177 = 6.2861 BTC [+] |
08:48 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [CBTC] 5000 @ 0.00012 = 0.6 BTC [+] |
08:50 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9200 @ 0.00088136 = 8.1085 BTC [-] {2} |
08:53 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [PETA] 3 @ 0.05 = 0.15 BTC [+] |
| |
~ 29 minutes ~ |
09:23 |
mircea_popescu |
.d |
09:23 |
ozbot |
1180923195.25803 | Next Diff in 1988 blocks | Estimated Change: -18.5612% in 16d 8h 45m 5s |
09:23 |
mircea_popescu |
ha |
09:26 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 63 @ 0.00283413 = 0.1786 BTC [+] {5} |
09:28 |
nubbins` |
nice |
09:30 |
knotwork |
wow yeah |
09:31 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9250 @ 0.00088251 = 8.1632 BTC [+] {2} |
09:39 |
mircea_popescu |
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/36/Federal_Debt_Held_by_the_Public_1790-2013.png << the picture of unsustainable. |
09:40 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 15050 @ 0.00088294 = 13.2882 BTC [+] {2} |
09:45 |
nubbins` |
world war 3 will be different, in that it won't be called world war 3 |
09:45 |
mircea_popescu |
heh. |
09:51 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [COG.F2] 1 @ 0.6 BTC [+] |
09:53 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 5 @ 0.29288977 = 1.4644 BTC [+] {2} |
10:03 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 13909 @ 0.00088324 = 12.285 BTC [+] |
10:04 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 7591 @ 0.0008834 = 6.7059 BTC [+] |
| |
~ 33 minutes ~ |
10:38 |
pankkake |
got a "coinchat is back" mail. I thought that was TradeFortress' thing? |
10:40 |
ThickAsThieves |
sounds right |
10:41 |
ThickAsThieves |
https://blockchain.info/pools |
10:41 |
ozbot |
Bitcoin Hashrate Distribution - Blockchain.info |
10:41 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9273 @ 0.00087754 = 8.1374 BTC [-] {2} |
10:41 |
ThickAsThieves |
BTCG and Ghash have big slices |
10:42 |
pankkake |
17% unknown :o |
10:42 |
ThickAsThieves |
wonder if governments will regulate mining pools one day |
10:42 |
pankkake |
they have every incentive to do so… but pools are also easy to hide |
10:43 |
pankkake |
perhaps at the cost of some latency |
10:43 |
ThickAsThieves |
the more hidden they are the less popular they are |
10:43 |
asciilifeform |
by 'regulate,' perhaps you mean pwn? |
10:43 |
asciilifeform |
how many miners are using authentication of any sort whatsoever |
10:44 |
pankkake |
regulation is "drowning by bureaucracy" |
10:44 |
asciilifeform |
you might already be mining for the reich |
10:44 |
asciilifeform |
without knowing it. |
10:44 |
pankkake |
hmm, very easy to MITM miners |
10:44 |
ThickAsThieves |
like limit pools to 10%, tax them |
10:44 |
ThickAsThieves |
etc |
10:45 |
asciilifeform |
and most 'special' of all are the folks who connect to pools... through tor. |
10:45 |
pankkake |
I would think more like forbid "bad" transactions |
10:45 |
ThickAsThieves |
like redlisting etc |
10:45 |
pankkake |
yeah |
10:46 |
ThickAsThieves |
its kinda like forking the chain |
10:46 |
asciilifeform |
ThickAsThieves: much easier would be a crown-imposed altcoin |
10:47 |
asciilifeform |
'trade yer TerrorCoins for ReichCoins! you can even pay tax in them.' |
10:48 |
ThickAsThieves |
i sure love paying tax |
10:48 |
asciilifeform |
pre-mined by your local Department of Plenty, naturally. |
10:49 |
pankkake |
I aim to sell Bernankoin to the USG! |
10:49 |
pankkake |
it's funny that no matter how hard you try to make a bad coin, people go out there to "promote" it |
10:50 |
ThickAsThieves |
someone should make an altcoin building program |
10:50 |
ThickAsThieves |
choose your settings |
10:50 |
pankkake |
yeah, that's should be my next project |
10:50 |
ThickAsThieves |
basically make it so any joe can make an altcoin |
10:51 |
pankkake |
like the (fake) RnB generator: http://pixdaus.com/files/items/pics/2/86/30286_c070b827bd67eecdc929eea629c45195_large.jpg |
10:52 |
ThickAsThieves |
you could even host pools |
10:52 |
ThickAsThieves |
make it a whole SaaS |
10:53 |
pankkake |
quite a lot of work, but sure should pay in the long run |
10:53 |
ThickAsThieves |
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2013/12/20/target-credit-cards-are-selling-for-20-100-each/ |
10:53 |
ozbot |
Stolen Target Credit Cards Are Selling For $20 - $100 Each - Forbes |
10:54 |
ThickAsThieves |
Bitcoin, as well as other irreversible and semi-anonymous ways of sending money including Litecoin, WebMoney, PerfectMoney, and traditional wire transfers. |
10:54 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 5275 @ 0.00087708 = 4.6266 BTC [-] |
10:54 |
ThickAsThieves |
They can be bought using, of course, Bitcoin, as well as other irreversible and semi-anonymous ways of sending money including Litecoin |
10:55 |
ThickAsThieves |
(Amusingly, one of my normal Bitcoin sources emailed me to say, “ If Target accepted Bitcoins, 40 million individuals would have been protected.” |
10:56 |
ThickAsThieves |
"The only good news: Krebs reports that the Target thieves did not get the cards CVV2 — that 3 or 4 digit security number printed on back of cards — which means they can’t do any online shopping with the cards. " |
10:56 |
ThickAsThieves |
thats not true at all |
10:56 |
pankkake |
credit cards is the worst security ever |
10:56 |
pankkake |
I don't even understand how something so bad can exist |
10:57 |
mircea_popescu |
because they were made before the internet forced tech up everyone's throat, by people who believe in legal solutions. |
10:57 |
ThickAsThieves |
Target is 10% off this weekend too |
10:58 |
ThickAsThieves |
their stock is up however |
10:58 |
mircea_popescu |
and any government that asserts any sort of infringement on teh republic of bitcoin's sovereignity, such as by purporting to "tax" bitcoins or to "regulate" mining etc is thereby declaring war, and will feel the full wrath and might of said republic. |
10:58 |
ThickAsThieves |
would you say the same about the internet? |
10:58 |
mircea_popescu |
no, inasmuch as the internet is not a republic. |
10:59 |
mircea_popescu |
what's the internet gonna do, blog about you ? |
10:59 |
ThickAsThieves |
block mining? |
11:00 |
mircea_popescu |
hm ? |
11:00 |
ThickAsThieves |
what if gov uses some roundabout means of internet control to impede bitcoin |
11:00 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 12016 @ 0.00087883 = 10.56 BTC [+] {2} |
11:00 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 5 @ 0.2929 = 1.4645 BTC [+] |
11:01 |
mircea_popescu |
well how would i know ? |
11:01 |
mircea_popescu |
likely bitcoin will use some roundabout means of internet control to impede nonsense. |
11:01 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.2929 BTC [+] |
11:02 |
ThickAsThieves |
hmm |
11:02 |
ThickAsThieves |
do you think bitcoin is dependent on the web? |
11:02 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11300 @ 0.00088045 = 9.9491 BTC [+] |
11:02 |
ThickAsThieves |
if so, should not the republic defend it? |
11:03 |
ThickAsThieves |
an attack on my friend |
11:03 |
mod6 |
bitcoin doesn't need the internet: http://trilema.com/2012/the-politics-of-bitcoin/ |
11:03 |
mircea_popescu |
bitcoin is not dependent on the web in any way. |
11:04 |
mircea_popescu |
what exactly is the relation of bitcoin to the web, mpoe-pr ? |
11:06 |
ThickAsThieves |
you think bitcoin would stay healthy without it the net? |
11:06 |
mod6 |
bitcoin will find a way. if anything, i think we'd build our own communications network if we needed to. |
11:07 |
ThickAsThieves |
well Gavin is on that satellite project right |
11:09 |
mod6 |
paul revere style light signals or even smoke signals would work. |
11:09 |
knotwork |
web and net are different, web is just another thing that uses the net as transport, much like bitcoin is |
11:10 |
ThickAsThieves |
assume i mean the network we all use to communicate |
11:10 |
knotwork |
bitcoin does depend on having some kind of net though if only sneakers-and-paper-wallets net |
11:11 |
ThickAsThieves |
how does mining happen? tx takes mos to confirm? |
11:11 |
knotwork |
print out a buy order GPG message to mpoe-pr and snailmail it to a penpal in Romania who drops it in a dead-drop for MPOE-spy to pick up |
11:11 |
knotwork |
mining is trickier yeah |
11:13 |
mircea_popescu |
ThickAsThieves how is bitcoin related to the web, sweriously |
11:13 |
knotwork |
run your local fork via sneakernet all year, then put it on santa's plate with his cookies and milk so when he zooms around the world faster than light he picks them all up, maybe even has a copier in his sleigh to copy it so he puts in your stocking all the chaisn from all the kids he visited before you |
11:13 |
knotwork |
so we'd have one year to two year long forks in progress constantly |
11:13 |
knotwork |
maybe less if easter bunny and tooth fairy help him |
11:14 |
knotwork |
or we could use acoustic modems over long distance phone lines but that is so much less elegant, albeit shorter forks. UUCP to the rescue, whee! |
11:15 |
knotwork |
subscribe to an alt.blockchains.bitcoin newsgroup, presto |
11:15 |
mircea_popescu |
probably a sort of point to point over wireless is already happening in the major cities |
11:15 |
mircea_popescu |
just too much spare wireless capacity available. |
11:16 |
knotwork |
ho yeah sure go ahead put Santa out of a job already, fine. :) |
11:16 |
mircea_popescu |
lol |
11:16 |
knotwork |
you can do UUCP over ham radio though sure |
11:17 |
mircea_popescu |
ThickAsThieves part of the problem is perhaps that you're confusing the internet and the web |
11:17 |
mircea_popescu |
irc for instance is not on the web |
11:17 |
knotwork |
The north pole is probably a big aerial for christmas ham radio anyway as well as a faster than light communicator so Santa can stay in touch with the Ms. wheil delivering prezzies. |
11:18 |
mircea_popescu |
it's on 194/6667 |
11:20 |
asciilifeform |
one thing i occasionally try to convince people off is that: the time to invent the parachute is before, rather than after, being thrown out of the plane |
11:20 |
asciilifeform |
bring back fidonet now. |
11:21 |
mircea_popescu |
i never knew it went away |
11:21 |
knotwork |
yeah somewhere between thrown in the deep end to learn to swim and thrown out of an airplane to incentivise inventing a parachute there is a slope of some slipperiness or lack of slipperiness or nasty friction or razor blades or something |
11:22 |
knotwork |
a gulf or divide maybe |
11:22 |
mircea_popescu |
anyway, the parachute argument eschews the infinity problem. |
11:22 |
mircea_popescu |
after you're done throwing an infinite number of people out of the airplane |
11:22 |
mircea_popescu |
there's an infinite number of people still using the airplane. |
11:23 |
asciilifeform |
flying Hilbert Hotel? |
11:23 |
mircea_popescu |
nobody can win the war on concepts, be they purely theoretical like heliocentrism or quite sordid like psychoactives, |
11:23 |
knotwork |
if there are an infinate number of people in the airplane then relativity maybe should indicate there must also be an infinite number of moments of time? |
11:23 |
mircea_popescu |
and the airplane throwing thing is a fascinating exercise in impotence. |
11:24 |
knotwork |
if so maybe we can later after inventing parachute put in an infinite number of parachutes, and even back when we built the first infinite-capacity airplane it would have all those parachutes that will eventually be invented? |
11:27 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 10219 @ 0.00087684 = 8.9604 BTC [-] {3} |
11:30 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 18900 @ 0.00088138 = 16.6581 BTC [+] {2} |
11:36 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [HMF] 10 @ 0.02102 = 0.2102 BTC [+] {4} |
11:39 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9341 @ 0.0008827 = 8.2453 BTC [+] {2} |
11:40 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11409 @ 0.00088425 = 10.0884 BTC [+] {2} |
11:40 |
the20year |
anyone know offhand what daily volume is at havelock? |
11:45 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 8472 @ 0.00088446 = 7.4931 BTC [+] |
11:46 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 5728 @ 0.00088463 = 5.0672 BTC [+] |
12:00 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [PETA] 4 @ 0.048801 = 0.1952 BTC [-] |
12:04 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [NEOBEE] 100 @ 0.002905 = 0.2905 BTC [+] |
12:12 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 14600 @ 0.00088463 = 12.9156 BTC [+] {2} |
12:15 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [CBTC] 2084 @ 0.00012 = 0.2501 BTC [+] |
12:15 |
zach_ |
hey i have a question for a mod or someone from bitbet |
12:15 |
zach_ |
does bitbet work with people sending funds from coinbase? |
12:15 |
nubbins` |
i think some guy got burned doing that a while ago |
12:16 |
nubbins` |
coinbase cheaped out on the tx fee, guy missed a bet deadline |
12:16 |
pankkake |
coinbase is known for sending transactions late, too |
12:17 |
zach_ |
na i'm asking because i saw on smoeother betting site that coinbase did not work for sending money to them, something about it sending it back to the same address, just like bitbet does, and there being issues with that |
12:17 |
pankkake |
but if you're early enough, why not, just be sure to specify an address manually |
12:17 |
pankkake |
bitbet allows you to have a custom address, it won't necessarily use the sending address |
12:18 |
zach_ |
ok, how do i contact someone from bitbet then |
12:19 |
pankkake |
you sent it already? |
12:19 |
zach_ |
yup... |
12:19 |
zach_ |
not totally sure but i don't think i specified a different address to receive |
12:19 |
pankkake |
I don't think you have a way to prove you were that transaction |
12:19 |
pankkake |
well you can see the out address on the public bet list |
12:23 |
mircea_popescu |
zach_ as long as you control the destination address, you'll be fine. |
12:24 |
mircea_popescu |
if however you send in such a way that your transaction doesn't make it before the bet closes, you're screwed. |
12:24 |
zach_ |
if i did not enter an address, it will just get sent back to coinbase correct? does that work are are there problems with that |
12:24 |
mircea_popescu |
this means, not using shitty services that don't add a fee to txs, and not betting late. |
12:24 |
mircea_popescu |
if you did not enter an address then coinbase thanks you for your donation. |
12:25 |
twizt |
lol so many half assed designed services |
12:25 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [NEOBEE] 100 @ 0.002904 = 0.2904 BTC [-] |
12:25 |
zach_ |
why would it not just go back to that same coinbase wallet, that is my wallet |
12:25 |
twizt |
zach_: i think that answer depends on how coinbase is designed... |
12:25 |
twizt |
anything we say is mere speculation |
12:26 |
Jere_Jones |
Was the 1B difficulty bet the largest bitbet ever? |
12:26 |
mircea_popescu |
zach_ because it is likely that coinbase uses some sort of minimal security. |
12:26 |
mircea_popescu |
this means that it sweeps its btc into a cold wallet, which also means it will be paying from addresses it controls, |
12:26 |
zach_ |
ok so if a bet has not resolved yet is there a way to change the address for it to send payouts |
12:26 |
mircea_popescu |
not from addresses you contrl. |
12:26 |
mircea_popescu |
no, there is no way to change addresses it sends payouts to. otherwise everyone would cash in on everyone else's bets. |
12:26 |
zach_ |
i can prove from my coinebase transaction history that the bet in question was sent by me |
12:27 |
mircea_popescu |
Jere_Jones nah, there were > 1k ones |
12:27 |
mircea_popescu |
course, back then btc was arguably less valuable. |
12:27 |
twizt |
zach_: i think their cust serv would be the best suited to answer your question |
12:27 |
nubbins` |
zach_: "prove" in what sense? |
12:27 |
mircea_popescu |
zach_ then you could i suppose pester them to credit it, when it shows up. in general however you should not be doing this. |
12:27 |
nubbins` |
a screenshot isn't proof |
12:27 |
zach_ |
no cuz i can show i sent it from my address to the given address it said to place the bet |
12:27 |
nubbins` |
prove to whom? |
12:28 |
mircea_popescu |
does coinbase actually allocate addresses to users, like a sort of wallet ? |
12:28 |
nubbins` |
coinbase or bitbet? |
12:28 |
mircea_popescu |
i thought it was a btc buying service. |
12:28 |
zach_ |
well now i know |
12:29 |
Namworld |
Not really. How would you prove you sent that transaction? You can't. A screenshot isn't good enough. I could make a screenshot and edit it 50 times for all amounts and claim all bets as mine. |
12:30 |
mircea_popescu |
Namworld i assumed they allow him to sign with the address ? |
12:30 |
Namworld |
Try showing coinbase the transaction out was sent to bitbet and it came back as a winning bet, if it happens you win. |
12:31 |
Namworld |
Not sure. I don't know how coinbase wallets are designed |
12:31 |
twizt |
^^^ |
12:31 |
twizt |
this isnt coinbase' cust service chat lol |
12:32 |
mircea_popescu |
so the guy can ask. course... always a good idea to ask before rather than after lol |
12:34 |
nubbins` |
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/13/12/21/0041228/reuters-rsa-weakened-encryption-for-10m-from-nsa |
12:34 |
ozbot |
Reuters: RSA Weakened Encryption For $10M From NSA - Slashdot |
12:34 |
mircea_popescu |
yest news nubs |
12:35 |
nubbins` |
;( |
12:40 |
asciilifeform |
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/2013/12/17/6569b226-6734-11e3-a0b9-249bbb34602c_story.html |
12:40 |
ozbot |
Tech executives to Obama: NSA spying revelations are threatening business - The Washington Post |
12:45 |
pankkake |
https://www.fsf.org/news/gluglug-x60-laptop-now-certified-to-respect-your-freedom |
12:45 |
ozbot |
Gluglug X60 Laptop now certified to Respect Your Freedom — Free Software Foundation — working to |
12:47 |
mircea_popescu |
certified by whom ? |
12:48 |
nubbins` |
FSF |
12:49 |
mircea_popescu |
better than nothing i guess. |
12:49 |
mircea_popescu |
meanwhile, http://trilema.com/2013/definitely-not-any-kind-of-a-more-like-c/ |
12:53 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 13200 @ 0.00088189 = 11.6409 BTC [-] {3} |
12:55 |
kakobrekla |
ok so i cant figure out which box is connected as kakobreklaaa |
12:57 |
kakobrekla |
ill try to reboot the whole house |
12:59 |
kakobreklaaa |
nvm found it! |
13:07 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9100 @ 0.00088165 = 8.023 BTC [-] |
13:09 |
mircea_popescu |
lmao |
13:18 |
mircea_popescu |
http://bitbet.us/bet/519/btc-network-difficulty-to-top-1b-before-2014/ paid, if anyone was watching excitedly. |
13:18 |
ozbot |
BitBet - BTC network difficulty to top 1B before 2014 |
13:18 |
mircea_popescu |
and for all the talk of displeasure, if one compares the |
13:18 |
mircea_popescu |
24-08-13 17:37Yes100`0002.00000000126cP3.77154710 |
13:18 |
mircea_popescu |
with the |
13:19 |
mircea_popescu |
18-12-13 14:04Yes5`2462.088341811468A2.16559433 |
13:19 |
mircea_popescu |
it seems rather balanced, within reason. |
13:19 |
mircea_popescu |
90ish percent vs 3ish% |
| |
~ 16 minutes ~ |
13:36 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 36550 @ 0.00088054 = 32.1837 BTC [-] {4} |
13:42 |
|
x60s? |
13:42 |
|
might as well sell them a 486 |
13:42 |
|
New 8-cell 5.2aH (5200mAh) battery installed (these are the larger variety, which come with extended battery life) |
13:42 |
|
gonna need it |
13:42 |
|
gimmicks |
13:52 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 632 @ 0.00087963 = 0.5559 BTC [-] |
13:53 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 18888 @ 0.00087736 = 16.5716 BTC [-] {2} |
13:53 |
mircea_popescu |
[\\\] ? |
14:05 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [NEOBEE] 151 @ 0.00296707 = 0.448 BTC [+] {4} |
14:10 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.29289999 BTC [-] |
14:13 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 10004 @ 0.00087667 = 8.7702 BTC [-] {2} |
| |
~ 15 minutes ~ |
14:28 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9520 @ 0.00088163 = 8.3931 BTC [+] {2} |
14:34 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 7876 @ 0.00088413 = 6.9634 BTC [+] {3} |
14:36 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [PETA] 15 @ 0.05 = 0.75 BTC [+] |
14:50 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [NEOBEE] 569 @ 0.00290279 = 1.6517 BTC [-] {3} |
14:50 |
kakobrekla |
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=380096.0 |
14:50 |
ozbot |
Pi Wallet - Secure your coins now |
14:51 |
kakobrekla |
hm nvm |
14:51 |
kakobrekla |
seems just en expencive rpi |
14:51 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [NEOBEE] 125 @ 0.00283127 = 0.3539 BTC [-] {4} |
14:54 |
Duffer1 |
Scarlett vs Naniwa on now, 14 btc prize |
14:54 |
Duffer1 |
http://www.twitch.tv/totalbiscuit |
14:54 |
ozbot |
Totalbiscuit - Twitch |
14:56 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11500 @ 0.00088548 = 10.183 BTC [+] |
14:56 |
kakobrekla |
bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5441.msg3947084#msg3947084 |
14:57 |
kakobrekla |
not like he knew the amt of fake euro debt he took upon himself from the start |
14:58 |
mircea_popescu |
lol |
15:00 |
mircea_popescu |
.d |
15:00 |
ozbot |
1180923195.25803 | Next Diff in 1944 blocks | Estimated Change: 8.5864% in 12d 7h 48m 27s |
15:01 |
mircea_popescu |
http://bitbet.us/bet/619/bitcoin-difficulty-at-or-above-2b-before-feb/ << is my math off or does the diff need to go up 30% both periods for this to come out yes ? |
15:01 |
ozbot |
BitBet - Bitcoin difficulty at or above 2B before Feb 2014 |
15:02 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 324 @ 0.00088548 = 0.2869 BTC [+] |
15:13 |
ThickAsThieves |
we'll have 3 changes before then right? |
15:14 |
mircea_popescu |
hm. i guess it's actually 41 days |
15:14 |
mircea_popescu |
so it could be 3 changes yes |
15:14 |
mircea_popescu |
right on the cusp |
15:15 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 12094 @ 0.0008841 = 10.6923 BTC [-] {2} |
15:15 |
mircea_popescu |
these crazy fucking bets. |
15:15 |
ThickAsThieves |
i think itll be just like this time |
15:15 |
mircea_popescu |
i still don't know how they manage to be so well picked ffs. |
15:15 |
ThickAsThieves |
seem absurd now, likely later, and obvious the week before |
15:15 |
mircea_popescu |
could be yeah |
15:16 |
ThickAsThieves |
I have a bet on Yes |
15:16 |
mircea_popescu |
allow me to rehash the usual arguments : this bet calls for a 50% increase in deployed hash power within a month. |
15:16 |
mircea_popescu |
this means a good few mwh |
15:16 |
ThickAsThieves |
3PH was added this period |
15:16 |
Duffer1 |
banking on bfl delivering their monarchs tat? :P |
15:16 |
ThickAsThieves |
why not 4 more? |
15:17 |
mircea_popescu |
welll.... |
15:17 |
ThickAsThieves |
cointerra delivering too right? |
15:17 |
mircea_popescu |
if you went to the us army and said "you have to increase your firepower by 50%. you have one month. you can't get a bank loan for this" |
15:17 |
ThickAsThieves |
and ghash taking over the world |
15:17 |
mircea_popescu |
then it'd be a much safer bet. |
15:17 |
Duffer1 |
and hashfast too i suppose |
15:18 |
ThickAsThieves |
mp you act like they need to decide in the present to deply PHs |
15:18 |
ThickAsThieves |
maybe they decided 2mos ago |
15:18 |
ThickAsThieves |
deploy |
15:18 |
mircea_popescu |
this is a point. |
15:19 |
mircea_popescu |
what's a ph cost by now, like 5mn ? |
15:19 |
ThickAsThieves |
good question |
15:19 |
ThickAsThieves |
thatll be the currency come spring |
15:19 |
ThickAsThieves |
how many PH you got? |
15:19 |
mircea_popescu |
lol |
15:19 |
ThickAsThieves |
do you even PH? |
15:20 |
mod6 |
heheh |
15:20 |
mircea_popescu |
lol |
15:20 |
mircea_popescu |
and the humans got 5 ph and the elves 7 and the dwarves only 3 cause they were midgets |
15:20 |
mircea_popescu |
yet the last ph... |
15:21 |
ThickAsThieves |
luke-jr! |
15:21 |
mircea_popescu |
i wonder if anyone still cpu solo mines |
15:21 |
mircea_popescu |
maybe there's someone in a cave somewhere, never turned it off. |
15:22 |
ThickAsThieves |
a lottery ticket is faster |
15:22 |
mircea_popescu |
maybe it's a girl and she likes it sloo |
15:23 |
ThickAsThieves |
is the girl in the cave or the cave in the girl? |
15:25 |
ThickAsThieves |
facebook sure is getting shitty |
15:25 |
ThickAsThieves |
it's all slow and myspacey now |
15:25 |
mircea_popescu |
pity i can't short it more. |
15:27 |
ThickAsThieves |
http://venturebeat.com/2013/12/21/carmats-groundbreaking-five-year-artificial-heart-gets-its-first-patient-in-france/ |
15:27 |
ozbot |
Carmat's groundbreaking five-year artificial heart gets its first patient in France | VentureBeat | |
15:27 |
mircea_popescu |
o hey |
15:27 |
ThickAsThieves |
"Not only did the company have to create something that minimized the risk of clot formation, but it also had to ensure that the device was repairable and reliable." |
15:28 |
ThickAsThieves |
Hello, can I speak with customer service, my heart has stopped functioning. Please hold. |
15:29 |
mircea_popescu |
i see about $3 per gh. so it'd be 3mn not 5 for a ph |
15:29 |
mircea_popescu |
people spendign 12 mn to buy mining gear in a month ? definitely. |
15:30 |
mircea_popescu |
maybe this is how bitcoin dies, we run out of longints to save the diff. |
15:30 |
ThickAsThieves |
those clean coins will be valuable one day |
15:35 |
mircea_popescu |
http://bitbet.us/bet/27/network-difficulty-under-20-million/ |
15:35 |
mircea_popescu |
the good old days. |
15:35 |
ozbot |
BitBet - Network Difficulty under 20 million. |
15:35 |
Duffer1 |
hehe |
| |
~ 22 minutes ~ |
15:58 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9000 @ 0.00088352 = 7.9517 BTC [-] |
16:09 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 20800 @ 0.00088077 = 18.32 BTC [-] {2} |
16:10 |
benkay |
those crazy chinese http://www.coindesk.com/chinese-bitcoin-exchange-okcoin-accused-faking-trading-data/ |
16:25 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [HIF] 402 @ 0.00043098 = 0.1733 BTC [-] {4} |
| |
~ 20 minutes ~ |
16:45 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4100 @ 0.00088072 = 3.611 BTC [-] |
| |
~ 29 minutes ~ |
17:14 |
kakobrekla |
hm |
17:15 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2334 @ 0.00088027 = 2.0546 BTC [-] |
17:15 |
kakobrekla |
got a word from inside of bitstamp, mysql server with no replication and once per day local mysql dump |
17:16 |
Duffer1 |
no replication? |
17:16 |
fiat500 |
such redundancy, much integrity, many backup, so wow |
17:16 |
benkay |
nice |
17:20 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4350 @ 0.00088352 = 3.8433 BTC [+] |
17:21 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 22 @ 0.2929 = 6.4438 BTC [+] |
| |
~ 20 minutes ~ |
17:42 |
benkay |
;;ud narpalt |
17:47 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [PETA] 30 @ 0.05 = 1.5 BTC [+] |
17:57 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [CBTC] 1000 @ 0.00012 = 0.12 BTC [+] |
17:58 |
jurov |
once per day? |
17:59 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [COG] [PAID] 1.79378050 BTC to 9`575 shares, 18734 satoshi per share |
18:08 |
mikaeldice |
This will end well |
18:09 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 14650 @ 0.00087974 = 12.8882 BTC [-] {2} |
18:17 |
mircea_popescu |
When asked about their shared Catholic faith, Eszterhas said of Gibson, "In my mind, his Catholicism is a figment of his imagination." |
18:26 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [PETA] 9 @ 0.05 = 0.45 BTC [+] |
18:30 |
benkay |
;;google the many ways mpex |
18:30 |
gribble |
Hometown Heroes: Kelsey McClellan | MPEX Experience: <http://mpex-experience.com/2013/11/26/hometown-heroes-kelsey-mcclellan/>; Loper OS » A Review of MPEx, the Bitcoin Stock Exchange.: <http://www.loper-os.org/?p=1108>; Prosoniq MPEX Home Page: <http://mpex.prosoniq.com/> |
18:30 |
benkay |
man google hates trilema |
18:33 |
benkay |
$depth S.NSA |
18:33 |
mpexbot |
benkay: S.NSA Bids: ['46213 @ 0.00012', '50000 @ 0.000107', '54387 @ 0.000105', '20000 @ 0.0001', '1000 @ 0.0001'] |
18:33 |
mpexbot |
benkay: Asks: ['7500 @ 0.00014', '10000 @ 0.00015', '9220 @ 0.00016', '35000 @ 0.00017', '50000 @ 0.00021'] |
18:34 |
mircea_popescu |
google got 10mn from nsa. |
18:41 |
benkay |
;;duckduckgo foo |
18:41 |
gribble |
Error: "duckduckgo" is not a valid command. |
18:41 |
benkay |
nanotube's an nsa stooge. |
18:41 |
asciilifeform |
http://www.loper-os.org/?p=1390 |
18:41 |
ozbot |
Loper OS » Of Decaying Urbits. |
18:42 |
jurov |
http://imgur.com/a/L8gJF |
18:42 |
ozbot |
A few gifs I have collected for your perusing. - Imgur |
18:44 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 16450 @ 0.00088038 = 14.4823 BTC [+] {2} |
18:49 |
ThickAsThieves |
http://chromawallet.com/ |
18:49 |
ozbot |
ChromaWallet |
18:50 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 10043 @ 0.00088081 = 8.846 BTC [+] |
18:55 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [COG] 6 @ 0.04999999 = 0.3 BTC [+] {2} |
18:57 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 25000 @ 0.00088376 = 22.094 BTC [+] {2} |
19:02 |
DiabloD3 |
http://imgur.com/gallery/fAHIYIS |
19:04 |
KRS|Gotyawallet |
you guys are holding the wrong coin http://www.reddit.com/r/dogecoin/comments/1tcro2/math_proves_everyone_on_earth_will_be_subscribed/ |
19:05 |
benkay |
such outer reaches of cosmos |
19:05 |
benkay |
real destination infinite |
19:05 |
KRS|Gotyawallet |
many things! |
| |
~ 17 minutes ~ |
19:23 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11827 @ 0.0008805 = 10.4137 BTC [-] {2} |
19:25 |
benkay |
$proxies |
19:25 |
mpexbot |
benkay: ["http://mpex.co", "http://mpex.ws", "http://mpex.bz", "http://mpex.coinbr.com", "http://mpex6.coinbr.com"] |
19:26 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [PETA] 10 @ 0.05 = 0.5 BTC [+] |
19:26 |
jurov |
drat, doesnt work |
19:33 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 29668 @ 0.00087671 = 26.0102 BTC [-] {4} |
19:35 |
benkay |
seems like none are up |
19:37 |
jurov |
mpex.co is |
19:39 |
benkay |
oh you |
19:41 |
benkay |
http://s3.amazonaws.com/rapgenius/1354338910_oh-you-93067263235.jpeg |
19:44 |
jurov |
mpex.coinbr.com fixed |
19:44 |
jurov |
mpex6.coinbr.com is ipv6 only |
19:45 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 20670 @ 0.00087615 = 18.11 BTC [-] {2} |
19:45 |
jurov |
looks like i went too creative with the spot instance |
19:46 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11513 @ 0.00087589 = 10.0841 BTC [-] {2} |
19:50 |
jurov |
lol nsa is definitely gobbling up all resources, now $0.02/hr for t1. micro in virginia? |
19:50 |
jurov |
(as opposed to 0.004 in oregon) |
19:53 |
jurov |
btw, now s3 supports post requests, it would be worthwhile to build mpex proxy using s3 only |
19:53 |
jurov |
anyone? |
19:59 |
mircea_popescu |
mebbe |
20:06 |
benkay |
s3 as trade interface |
20:06 |
benkay |
trade interface all the things |
20:16 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [PETA] 4 @ 0.05 = 0.2 BTC [+] |
20:16 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM100] 57 @ 0.00283389 = 0.1615 BTC [+] |
20:18 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 23400 @ 0.00087529 = 20.4818 BTC [-] {3} |
20:24 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 39200 @ 0.00087818 = 34.4247 BTC [+] |
20:26 |
benkay |
!t m s.mpoe |
20:26 |
assbot |
[MPEX:S.MPOE] 1D: 0.00087445 / 0.00088417 / 0.00091105 (939510 shares, 830.69 BTC), 7D: 0.00087445 / 0.00089949 / 0.00091394 (5991164 shares, 5,389.04 BTC), 30D: 0.0007725 / 0.00087086 / 0.00091394 (13560569 shares, 11,809.38 BTC) |
20:32 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 17250 @ 0.00087818 = 15.1486 BTC [+] |
20:35 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 48888 @ 0.00087445 = 42.7501 BTC [-] |
| |
~ 19 minutes ~ |
20:54 |
benkay |
;;calc ((500 - 400) / 400) - 0.0044804 |
20:54 |
gribble |
0.2455196 |
20:58 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 33200 @ 0.00087423 = 29.0244 BTC [-] {3} |
| |
~ 30 minutes ~ |
21:29 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 25300 @ 0.00087356 = 22.1011 BTC [-] {3} |
21:31 |
benkay |
;;ticker --market btcavg |
21:31 |
gribble |
BitcoinAverage BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 593.43, Best ask: 596.84, Bid-ask spread: 3.41000, Last trade: 594.23, 24 hour volume: 61377.55, 24 hour low: None, 24 hour high: None, 24 hour vwap: 613.28 |
21:35 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 36449 @ 0.00087268 = 31.8083 BTC [-] {4} |
21:36 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2651 @ 0.00087125 = 2.3097 BTC [-] |
21:39 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 22584 @ 0.00087125 = 19.6763 BTC [-] |
21:48 |
benkay |
;;ticker --market btcavg |
21:48 |
gribble |
BitcoinAverage BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 590.98, Best ask: 594.3, Bid-ask spread: 3.32000, Last trade: 593.02, 24 hour volume: 61055.72, 24 hour low: None, 24 hour high: None, 24 hour vwap: 612.54 |
21:49 |
benkay |
davout: what are the delivery venues for X.EUR? |
21:50 |
benkay |
ah, bitcoin-central. nevermind. |
21:51 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [SFI] 1000 @ 0.001 = 1 BTC |
| |
~ 44 minutes ~ |
22:36 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [NEOBEE] 2360 @ 0.00281965 = 6.6544 BTC [-] {15} |
22:39 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [CBTC] 4125 @ 0.00012 = 0.495 BTC [+] |
| |
~ 18 minutes ~ |
22:57 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.28601101 BTC [-] |
22:58 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.29484 BTC [+] |
22:59 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.29486 BTC [+] |
23:00 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 27 @ 0.29610147 = 7.9947 BTC [+] {4} |
23:03 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.297 BTC [+] |
23:08 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 2 @ 0.297 = 0.594 BTC [+] |
23:17 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 141200 @ 0.00087239 = 123.1815 BTC [+] {2} |
23:27 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4409 @ 0.00087125 = 3.8413 BTC [-] |
23:28 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 28600 @ 0.00087103 = 24.9115 BTC [-] |
23:36 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 14617 @ 0.0008706 = 12.7256 BTC [-] |
23:48 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2132 @ 0.00087223 = 1.8596 BTC [+] |
23:48 |
KRS|Gotyawallet |
a btc exchange opened in Romania today? cant find anything on it |
23:52 |
mircea_popescu |
not today, days ago. |
23:52 |
mircea_popescu |
tis in teh logs. |
23:57 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [CBTC] 8000 @ 0.00012 = 0.96 BTC [+] |
23:59 |
assbot |
[HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.297 BTC [+] |
23:59 |
assbot |
[MPEX] [S.MPOE] 41729 @ 0.00086864 = 36.2475 BTC [-] {2} |