| 17:12 |
asciilifeform |
shinohai: test |
| 17:13 |
shinohai |
asciilifeform: ack work \o/ |
| |
~ 26 minutes ~ |
| 17:40 |
whaack |
howdy pestnet |
| 17:41 |
whaack |
mod6: I'm around today if you want to try to figure out our peering problem |
| 17:49 |
whaack |
PeterL: Do you copy? |
| 17:49 |
PeterL |
hi all? |
| 17:50 |
PeterL |
yup, I see you |
| 17:50 |
whaack |
nice, did not know you were in here, let's peer |
| 17:50 |
PeterL |
sure, gpg me a key? |
| 17:51 |
whaack |
one minute |
| 17:55 |
whaack |
PeterL: http://paste.deedbot.org/?id=CDXV |
| 17:58 |
whaack |
in other news, i've been working on cleaning up my block explorer, i hope to have a vpatch out by the end of the month, but it may come as late as the end of February |
| 18:01 |
PeterL |
whaack: I added you as a peer and at, but I am still seeing "no packets received"? |
| 18:02 |
shinohai |
whaack: Great news, look forward to reading more about trb explorer. |
| 18:11 |
whaack |
peterl: goddamn, mod6 had the same problem, i have nfi what's going on, shinohai managed to peer with me |
| 18:13 |
whaack |
billymg as well |
| 18:14 |
whaack |
PeterL: how about now? |
| 18:15 |
whaack |
i forgot to actually associate the key i sent you to the handle |
| 18:15 |
PeterL |
lol, that could be a problem |
| 18:17 |
whaack |
still no dice apparently |
| 18:18 |
whaack |
in other weird, when i run /at it says no packets received from shinohai/asciilifeform, but i see their messages directly and i also get hearsay messages from them |
| 18:18 |
asciilifeform |
whaack: which pestron are you running atm? |
| 18:18 |
shinohai |
same here, "no packets received" almost always |
| 18:18 |
asciilifeform |
(in blatta 9983, at is broken) |
| 18:18 |
PeterL |
I thought I saw the other day at needs to lose an if somewhere? |
| 18:19 |
shinohai |
oh wait i forgot I patched, now see packets for erryoneEXCEPT billymg |
| 18:19 |
PeterL |
I'm on 9983 |
| 18:19 |
asciilifeform |
it does, but this aint in awt's vtree yet |
| 18:19 |
billymg |
shinohai: we gotta try repeering |
| 18:19 |
asciilifeform |
(and as shinohai said, evidently doesn't fully cure) |
| 18:20 |
shinohai |
PeterL: Teh patch: http://btc.info.gf/paste/376178@raw |
| 18:20 |
shinohai |
billymg: kk |
| 18:21 |
PeterL |
shinohai: thanks |
| 18:21 |
whaack |
asciilifeform: 9983 |
| 18:32 |
whaack |
awt: i don't quite understand why there is a table 'wot' that just has id numbers, can't this be removed and we just always use the handles table? |
| 18:32 |
whaack |
atm my wot has 9 rows, and my handles table only has 8 rows, not sure if that is a problem |
| 18:32 |
asciilifeform |
whaack: see spec; a peer may have >1 handle |
| 18:32 |
asciilifeform |
one oughtn't to be able to have a peer w/ 0 handles tho (how wouldja even get there?) |
| 18:33 |
whaack |
asciilifeform: ah okay ty |
| 18:35 |
whaack |
awt: found the bug, i tried to add a handle that already existed, and the command failed, but another row got added to my wot table |
| |
↖ |
| 18:35 |
whaack |
peterl: this is potentially the reason why we cannot peer |
| 18:36 |
PeterL |
aha, can you remove it manually using sqlite3? |
| 18:39 |
whaack |
peterl: i did, but i don't think that was the bug in the end, don't see how deleting those rows could have helped |
| 18:41 |
asciilifeform |
http://logs.bitdash.io/pest/2022-01-10#1002429 << sounds like bona fide bug. << awt |
| 18:41 |
bitbot |
Logged on 2022-01-10 18:35:11 whaack[asciilifeform|billymg]: awt: found the bug, i tried to add a handle that already existed, and the command failed, but another row got added to my wot table |