Show Idle (>14 d.) Chans


← 2019-11-02 | 2019-11-04 → ↓
00:02 lobbes lol whoops. (I realize I don't bother tab-completing your nick since it is so short)
00:02 lobbes hmm but this may just be another 'user error' on my end actually. At least in all my test cases the source post did not have a link to the target post in the post content. Plus I just tested via the blog (making sure to actually link) and a self-pingback using the selection syntax worked
00:02 lobbes So false alarm I suppose. (As for why I was trackback-ing arbitrary posts that do not have links, it was part of mp-wp bot's trackback testing)
00:04 jfw Ahh makes sense.
~ 12 hours ~
12:04 diana_coman hello davout, it's been a long time
~ 3 hours 6 minutes ~
15:10 diana_coman jfw: how's it going?
~ 19 minutes ~
15:30 jfw diana_coman: not the greatest, I'm in the eleventh hour crunch again
15:31 jfw draft is not finished
15:31 diana_coman jfw: what does it lack to be finished?
15:35 jfw I've got a bunch of context as to my original goals and steps but what's lacking is much delving into the events of the month
15:36 diana_coman jfw: in truth, it is a whole month indeed, dunno who exactly made it that.. long :P
15:36 diana_coman but I'll let you focus on it now then, no worries.
15:41 dorion dunno who exactly made it that.. long :P << keks
15:45 jfw diana_coman: ok. Assuming I make it out of this one alive, is there an upcoming assignment I should get in next week's plan?
15:47 diana_coman jfw: an overview of the WoT as you understand it.
15:48 jfw alright
15:48 diana_coman and do get out of it alive.
~ 46 minutes ~
16:34 diana_coman dorion: what's the difference between negative space and blind spots?
16:41 dorion diana_coman I'm not sure.
16:43 * dorion searching in log now.
16:44 diana_coman dorion: the easiest way to get an idea as to negative space is from drawing:
16:44 diana_coman think of drawing an object such as a chair; the direct and usual approach is to look at the chair and attempt to draw its parts
16:45 diana_coman however, the result is often way, way better if you look instead not at the chair itself but at the surrounding reality borders - basically the space that the chair takes out of its surroundings
16:46 diana_coman the chair-shaped gap, if you want
16:46 diana_coman no matter which bit or object you are looking at, there will be borders between it and surroundings
16:47 diana_coman the object itself is the "positive" as in that's what you were interested in to start with; but the space *around* it (and not just arbitrary but effectively *defining* it) is the negative space
16:47 dorion hmm, so then how the chair displaces whatever in the surroundings would've been there otherwise?
16:48 diana_coman as such, the negative space has nothing to do directly with blind spots (in that such blind spots are your own ie related to your vision, things you don't see; while the negative space has to do with the object it defines)
16:49 diana_coman dorion: more like how the chair is *defined* as a result of taking things away from the whole ; as opposed to "positive" definition of the more usual sort "this chair is 4 wooden legs and one wooden plank"
16:50 diana_coman this difference btw goes way way deeper in that it touches on how meaning of words is constructed even (or at least in some languages)
16:51 diana_coman dorion: the chair-drawing exercise is simple enough you can even do it, if you want; ie draw something focusing on the object itself; then on another day draw the same thing focusing on what is not-object in your chosen viewframe
16:51 diana_coman and then compare the two
16:51 diana_coman (now I have no idea how good you are at drawing, heh)
16:52 diana_coman obviously, if you do it, choose something reasonably non-compact ie preferably not-a-tennis-ball, lolz.
16:52 dorion diana_coman in that sense, I can be defined not by what I'm saying here or even the topic, but that you'd be doing something else right now if not delivering this negative space likbez.
16:53 diana_coman well, you are not really defined by what I'm saying though :)
16:53 diana_coman but our interaction, yes
16:54 dorion I see.
16:54 diana_coman onth blind spots are really like in a car's mirror: those bits and parts that you don't see; as to *why* you don't see them, there can be all sorts of reasons
16:54 * dorion not very practiced at drawing, but will give it a try.
16:55 diana_coman dorion: fwiw the "negative space drawing" is actually quite often used as an exercise to help beginners draw *better* pictures than they would otherwise.
16:56 diana_coman dorion: does that make sense?
16:57 dorion yes, thank you.
16:57 diana_coman you're welcome.
16:58 dorion that I wasn't, or don't remember, being assigned such a drawing exercise indicates the poverty of my previous teachers or my lack of previous interest.
16:59 dorion they probably go hand in hand though.
17:02 diana_coman actual feedback and help to grow is rare indeed.
17:07 whaack another similar drawing exercise is to copy another drawing, but upside down, and then flip your final result. (i found the exercise from a book, "Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain" by Betty Edwards, recommended in a tlp post) i did the exercise and it produced the best drawing i've ever done lol
17:08 dorion yeah, modern 'teachers' are mainly there for 'work' being done at 3pm, summers off and the cushy pension checks, i.e. welfare.
17:08 diana_coman whaack: yes.
17:09 diana_coman dorion: in truth, there will never be enough teachers for *everyone* so yes, if you insist that everyone gets a teacher like that by decree, what else can you get than ...welfare.
17:09 whaack my understanding from the tlp post is these drills prevent your brain from reducing the subject you're drawing to symbols "human head => circle"
17:09 dorion also, kids are easier to bully with nonsense compared to adults.
17:10 diana_coman whaack: there is an element of that for sure; but the definition by subtraction vs definition by parts is more than just "don't reduce it to predefined symbols"
17:12 diana_coman dorion: eh, not all that many adults around either :P
17:12 dorion diana_coman I've read from john taylor gatto that back in one room school house days when US was relatively literate (perhaps not compared to their comtemporaries, but to modernity), older students taught the younger, with teaching as a form of proving understanding.
17:13 dorion diana_coman sure, esp after so many generations of prussian model, state enforced schooling.
17:14 diana_coman that in itself doesn't mean though that teaching was necessarily more than the prussian model really; it's just the natural result of mixed ages basically; while it may help in getting some deeper understanding, it's still not going to do much by itself, it's not like older students are all teachers just like that.
17:15 diana_coman dorion: do you have siblings?
17:16 dorion yeah, a sister 3 years younger.
17:16 diana_coman heh, never explained to her anything?
17:18 dorion sure. my peculiar sitaution unfolded such that we weren't really close until ~after~ I moved out. In part because we were only in the same school building 2 years out of 15. when I was 12 and 18..
17:19 diana_coman well, not in school but at home, lol; anyways, there you have it: it's enough to have a gap and people will "teach" one another *if they care* about that other, obv; that's the main part there.
17:19 whaack dorion: I think that is pretty normal. (becoming closer with your siblings when you no longer liver together)
17:19 diana_coman bwahahaha; good god, NO.
17:19 diana_coman lolz
17:20 diana_coman I can see the angle if basically you needed some space too but uhm, don't make it a rule, there's nothing solid behind it.
17:21 dorion diana_coman I see.
17:22 whaack lol ok
17:22 dorion whaack I dunno, I know plenty of siblings that were real close. In my situation, athletics were central to my activities and I was always interested in playing with the older kids on the block. thus drove my sister away a lot the time.
17:23 dorion once I realized sports don't matter and there's a big world out there, started talking to her more and realized I enjoyed her company.
17:23 diana_coman whaack: you are there like in eulora, approx: happiness is having a large, close-knit family in another town.
17:24 dorion and whaack thanks for the drawing exercise suggestion, sounds like a trip.
17:24 whaack right. i may be just projecting my experience on others. (to be clear by 'closer' i mean 'the level at which you appreciate any given moment') and if i think more about it i'm not sure that that's even the case for me
17:25 diana_coman heh, even thinking is re-thinking!
17:25 whaack any given moment together*
17:26 * diana_coman will bbl
17:27 whaack i'm not sure what you mean by 'you are there like in eulora'.
17:37 dorion http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/ossasepia/2019-11-03#1008672 << which languages would those be ?
17:37 ossabot Logged on 2019-11-03 12:55:20 diana_coman: this difference btw goes way way deeper in that it touches on how meaning of words is constructed even (or at least in some languages)
~ 1 hours 49 minutes ~
19:27 diana_coman whaack: eulora has those quite pithy "message of the day", among which there's the one I paraphrased there
19:27 diana_coman and your statement that it's quite normal to get along better with siblings only once not living together is pretty much that "loving, carrying and close-knit is great but mainly when far away too"
19:28 whaack diana_coman: is it bad that I agree with that quote?
19:35 diana_coman whaack: why /how would it be bad?
19:36 diana_coman dorion: greek is cannonical example there.
19:36 diana_coman but I suspect it's more a matter of the *people* speaking "the language" than language as a separate entity (if it can ever be separate anyway)
19:37 diana_coman ie your own definitions of words can be the simple-cut-out 4legs+plank style or the much more perceptive negative-space style
19:37 whaack diana_coman: well perhaps one could say that someone who wants a "loving, caring, and a closet-knit family, but from a distance" is not all that loving and caring.
19:38 diana_coman onth def of words is further iffy in that it inevitably depends on/draws in the speaker's own knowledge otherwise (and with rather unrestricted scope too)
19:39 diana_coman whaack: ahaha; no, not at all; it can mean several things out of a bunch but quite unlikely to mean "not all that loving and caring"
19:39 diana_coman closet-knit though is a different thing :D
19:43 whaack lol XD
19:43 diana_coman whaack: so why would you rather have them further away?
19:46 whaack diana_coman: i would have my friends/family 30 minutes away, ideally. close enough to make visits, but far enough so that there is cost to come over and say "come play with meeee"
19:47 diana_coman that's answering "what does further away mean", not "why"
19:49 diana_coman it's clearly that essentially you want to have your own space (and not just physical space) too which is perfectly adult-like, obviously.
19:49 whaack living near friends saps me of money, personal development, etc. this problem is twofold. (1) shitty friends (2) having an issue saying 'no' to the 'come play with meee' plea
19:49 diana_coman aha
19:50 diana_coman they are related but yeah, make better friends and then you won't need to keep them "close but not too close"
19:51 diana_coman whenever you end up with sort of mitigation (that's what you are doing there with close but not that close), you are pretty much living with a broken thing really
19:52 whaack hmm ok
19:52 diana_coman and while some broken things might perhaps be inevitable around or happen from time to time, they 1. will cost you 2. are not mandatory
19:53 diana_coman whaack: the trouble is not as much that "family is broken" but rather that you still rely on them for warmth and close-knit (and as a result you have to deal somehow with the natural rift otherwise)
19:55 diana_coman but anyway, as far as I understood you actually quite took care of this part ie you have your own place and time without forced "come play with meee" , no?
19:55 whaack diana_coman: yes! it is a problem that currently seems fixed and i feel 100% better for it.
19:56 diana_coman good for you; and glad to hear it :)
~ 1 hours 29 minutes ~
21:25 davout diana_coman: cheers! long time indeed
21:25 diana_coman oh hey, wb davout ; where are you those days?
21:27 davout i'm in the uk right now
21:28 diana_coman ha; so come to reading/london some time?
21:28 davout sure why not, i'm in oxford so really not very far
21:28 diana_coman did you get your pilot license or what?
21:29 diana_coman once in a blue moon I even still go to oxford but no idea when it's next blue moon,lolz
21:29 davout i literally got the license in the mail yesterday!
21:30 diana_coman congrats!
21:31 BingoBoingo Congrats davout.
21:33 diana_coman davout: so what brings you back?
21:34 davout BingoBoingo: cheers
21:36 davout mucho mas tiempo, and missing the republican intellectual stimulation tbh
21:38 davout BingoBoingo: what happened to pizzaro isp?
21:40 davout i had a cursory look for a summary, couldn't find one
21:42 diana_coman davout: this might be some summary including a bit re pizarro.
21:43 davout ty
21:43 diana_coman anyways, fire me an email and come for a coffee or lunch or something.
21:44 * diana_coman will be back tomorrow
~ 32 minutes ~
22:16 lobbes davout: congrats on the license (and wb)
22:17 davout your captain thanks you
22:30 BingoBoingo davout: Sales ever took off in the way they needed to to survive the datacenter going non-performant
22:32 davout yeah, i guess having your sole provider going full retard isn't exactly helpful
22:32 davout either
22:35 BingoBoingo Right now it's at the point where they lawyers are trying to work out the logistics of talking to each other.
22:35 trinque good evening davout
22:35 davout trinque: bonsoir!
22:37 davout BingoBoingo: yeah, i saw that bit, where even the language used in e-mail communication requires adjustment
22:38 BingoBoingo davout: Email communication has since stopped, nothing to communicate about through that channel.
22:38 BingoBoingo brb, air
← 2019-11-02 | 2019-11-04 → ↑